Posted this above, but for the record, Mike disliked Synecdoche too (giving it 2.5/5 as opposed to Anomalisa's 4/5), as did I, so his positive review here has me looking forward to this quite a bit.

Mike disliked Synecdoche too (giving it 2.5/5 as opposed to Anomalisa's 4/5), as did I, so his positive review here has me looking forward to this quite a bit.

1. Two Days, One Night
2. Boyhood
3. Only Lovers Left Alive
4. Under the Skin
5. A Story of Yonosuke
6. The Tale of Princess Kaguya
7. Interstellar
8. Coherence
9. The Grand Budapest Hotel
10. Starred Up

Yeah, I wish he loved the show (and probably would do this same attitude to people who hated it), so it would really sink in that it's not the opinions he held, but the righteous, angry, contemptuous tone he expressed them, especially towards people who don't think the same as he does.

On the need to defend the babadook… not far down the comments in here: http://www.avclub.com/artic…

That wouldn't surprise me, since I noticed him from his repetitive screeches at Erik Adams. Critics here get yelled at half the time (and a lot of it was unnecessarily mean), so it's telling that he stood out, and I remember finding his posts against Erik Adams really vicious, mean-spirited, and relentless. How poor…

I stated my reason, and you still think I really showed up here only for you? As opposed to say… anytime during the apparently more divisive first season (although I gleaned that half of that are reactions to the reviewer as well) and also most of this season? I really wasn't overstating my initial post, was I?

I have a posting history for you to see, you know.

"annoy the ever loving hell out of me." I have a guess that this feeling is very mutual in the Disqus of the shows you watched.

Again with the presumptive rage, and again with the wrong. Not everything's about you, you know? (although the blind rage in more than half of your ubiquitous posting may give that impression) Sam Adams tweeted (and other critics joined in) about how this episode will be "very polarizing". Since I figured I haven't…

lol @ "Leftovers fanbase". His usual presumptive condescension combined with unreasonable rage. Not even watching the show yet (hearing "very depressing" during the first season run has me hesitating, although this season's strings of great reviews may have me check it out soon).

Forget it, it's beema.

มีหนังสองไตรภาคที่ต่างกันอย่างสิ้นเชิงในเนื้อเรื่อง
แต่เชื่อมต่อกันแน่นสนิทเหลือเกินในบางประเด็นและการใช้ “เวลา” คือหนังไตรภาคชุด Before
ของ
Richard Linklater และหนังไตรภาค Toy Story หนังสามภาคของทั้งสองชุดมีการทิ้งช่วงห่างเป็นระยะระหว่างภาค
และใช้ “เวลา”…

Seeing a through-line in many film people now that I will sub "Purity of Cinema People": don't rate a movie because "art is not to be put on a scale" + getting outraged when many movies older than 40 years receive less than A + a lot of the shocked "only 10 minutes of movies? but… art!" comments here

I feel like you would have get less immediate flaks here (although that's often par for the course in the AV Club comments — "no you don't like long takessss", "no you don't give A++++++ to these classic everyone-obviously-knows-it's-A+++++ films and that's offensiveeeee") if you include in the article the caveats…

Solid enough joke. That must have taken a long time to come up with.

Yeah, this is pretty well-known in Thailand here too, but under the name of Snoopy. There's definitely market for it.

Seriously though, it still boggles my mind that he didn't like RASHOMON (2.5/5 on his scale vs 5+++/5 for me), but his thoughts on it, like here, are thoroughly articulated and well reasoned that if you don't get hung up on the film's status, you should be fine with the rare, unintentional dissent. But fuck…

But don't you know, it's canonical! No matter how much you articulate on why you don't completely love it to death (and never mind that 'B' still indicates positivity), it's still C-A-N-O-N-I-C-A-L. beloved movies+time = instant sainthood!

If you're gonna pull this card in the end why baiting people into writing thoughtful, reasonable discussion in the first place?