The Swatch is the handheld version, the TV version is the Stitch
The Swatch is the handheld version, the TV version is the Stitch
You partially have to hope you get lucky and managed to think like the creator.
On the TV show you do have to guess the connections, but that’s probably hard to make a computer score
One category that has 5 answers but one of the answers belongs to a different group?
You’re right, there were digital games on the Wii U, but it wouldn’t be simple. For one the backwards compatibility would have to be digital only, so it’s already cutting out a huge percentage of the already small Wii U player base that could take advantage of it. Also, the Wii U is meant to be on 2 screens and…
A lot of non-gamer people thought it was an accessory add-on.
Yeah it’s weird that they didn’t just build a disc reader into a cartridge-based console for backwards compatibility with one of their biggest failures, definitely shows that there’ll never be backwards compatibility again
My question is, will games be transferrable from one Switch to the Switch 2
Nintendo is the master of unforced errors and nobody would have expected a complete disaster to follow the raging success of the Wii either.
Even when a reddit community is fairly reasonable about discussions it still feels like they end up much more on the cynical/negative side of opinions, especially around the launch of a game.
Interesting, they sometimes pull/delist trailers/directs when they’re getting ready for a new announcement but it seems like a bad move to announce it right before their final holiday push for the Switch. Does seem to be another piece of evidence of a reveal in the next several months though. I suspect it’ll be…
Exactly, it’s easy to say something is “getting a pass” because it sells well, but it’s possible to enjoy something while still acknowledging its flaws, even major flaws. It got the worst reviews of any new generation of Pokemon by far, bad enough that they even publicly apologized for the quality. I don’t really think…
Every game has things that look a little awkward if you look at them too closely. The King Kong game would be fine if something of this caliber were the worst thing wrong with its animations.
Saying “it’s popular for [x]” doesn’t mean “it owes its popularity to [x],” it just means “it’s a popular place to get [x]”
I think it’s weird when people act like spoilers only pertain to story and that there’s nothing else that anyone could want to not see ahead of time. Heck, the game is even named after the sense of wonder that they want you to feel as you’re surprised all the unexpected things that happen in the game which definitely…
“The bias has to stop” -someone making an impassioned straw man and working on incorrect information
It wasn’t good. Open world is fun when you can take your time and explore at your own pace, Sonic games are good when you can go with the flow and follow where it’s taking you, steering and jumping as necessary. You can immediately see the problem. If you just let the world take you where it wants you to, it’s fine,…
Gonna just copy and post what I said to you last time I saw you bring up this nonsensical idea
I don’t really think it’s for “mystique,” Nintendo usually just doesn’t really lean into “behind the scenes” stuff that much. I think in this case they just want the new VA’s performance to stand on its own without making a big deal about it.
The starfield character in the thumbnail of the video actually looks okay, but some of those, lookin’ at you cloud, are horrendous