Thank you for including the pictures they inexplicably did not put in the article

Eventually all KFC offerings come out in spray form, if you catch my drift.

Doesn’t look low budget at all? And the effects fit that Scott Pilgrim aesthetic.

Funny, I looked at each of the shows you mentioned with a sense of wonder and fun. I also look forward to seeing them, ill-fitting rubber suits and CW effects even.  

I love Goo, but I wouldn’t rank it #1. 

Goo was solid for a major-label debut, but putting it at #1 is ridiculous. Not as ridiculous as putting Daydream Nation at #2; seems like a clear editorial directive to not do the predictable (but correct) thing and put it at #1. Dirty at #6 is a bad choice as well, but I guess it was the first time people saw SY on…

The article only says he was reportedly leaving a Subway. It does not say the rest is alleged or reported. Nor does the title. The title is tacitly stating “this is what happened”

“Empire’s Jussie Smollett hospitalized after racist, homophobic attack outside Chicago restaurant”

That’s the AV Club going along with the story as fact, just like you said didn’t happen. 

Plus leaving the noose on for a photo op hours later was fishy. Black people don’t enjoy walking around in nooses for fun and certainly not for photos.

https://www.avclub.com/empires-jussie-smollett-hospitalized-after-racist-homo-1832162436

Initially, it sounded like somebody made up a hate crime and threw every element into the book to make it sound like the worst thing ever, without thinking of how ridiculous it seemed: Red hats? “This is MAGA country?” Bleach? A noose? I mean....all of them at once?

Lol.  Little reason to doubt?  Ok, bro. 

First trailer? I swear I saw a trailer for this like two months ago... am I crazy? 

Though a Bill Murray Batman seems very...

It’s the royal we. I’m the king of Spain.

I was honestly surprised to see Carrey and Thurman that high, given how horrific the movies themselves were. Just oof.

It really couldn’t possibly have been more clear from the movie that they wanted to reimagine Luthor as a Mark Zuckerberg-type modern tech guy, and that they cast Eisenberg because he had literally just played Zuckerberg.  That kind of “write the end first and then let’s backtrack to make it sort-of make sense”…

His version of Luthor would have fit better if he hadn’t been a megacorp CEO and went more Silver Age mad scientist with him. Or if we’d had more time with him as a CEO and then slowly saw him go nuts as he tried to make sense of the wildness of Superman and what he represents. But I guess we could say that the…

I would argue that that hardly counts as an onscreen connection with Batman. Baby Bruce Wayne and Batman are not the same person.