thanks, voice of reason

Maybe the guy editing the video had a sliver of common sense and assumed a bunch of internet crybabies wouldn’t have a field day over it

A better headline would read “A Bunch of Internet Crybabies are up JJ Redick’s Ass Today”

“But he still said what he said, in a way that most people heard what is being talked about and being published”

re: your first sentence, you should be saying that because it’s common sense

ok so you have been affected by real racism, and this obvious mistake gets you ruffled? you are a basket case, or you’re just looking to be offended

“this kind of pervasive racism” wtf are you even talking about

genuinely offended crybabies who would hang an innocent man for a slip up

that kinja money. piece of shit sellout. slow news day?

dude shut the fuck up you are so stupid

“I think it’s obnoxious to scold people for being offended by what they genuinely believe to be derogatory or insensitive or malicious.”

You’re a moron. Racism exists. This isn’t it. You’re not helping the actual problem by being a moron about what was obviously a mistake.

“It’s very hard to watch this video—and especially this video, which zeroes in on Redick’s message—and not wonder whether J.J. Redick is, in fact, trying to smuggle an insult into what is otherwise meant to be a greeting. “

If you’re going to argue that there is not an objective standard, then may don’t put your douche-foot forward when someone states their opinion about a really shitty painting.

Koonings portrait of JFK bears his likeness. This portrait does not bear likeness of Michelle Obama

das racist

Decent people don’t go around referring to themselves as decent people. You’re a pompous ass and you, too, have things you need to work on.

completely subjective viewpoint is completely subjective viewpoint

false equivalence. you must be a blast at parties

I love the “we invented it you can’t have it”. I hope this conversation was had on a phone and in English.