Yeah, it wasn’t a great part and she’s not a great actress.

Did anyone else think her part on OITNB was kind of...blah? I was all jazzed about her and looking forward to her storyline and was disappointed.

Well, it will never be royals.

Um, excuse me?

Look, I think it’s absolutely correct that life begins at conception. The true argument is the significance of that life. The belief driving the anti-choice movement is once the sperm meets the egg, the heavens open up, and God plants a special little angel in your love box. When really, all that happened is two cells…

I don’t even argue against the idea that life begins at conception. So what. It is not about life. It’s about someone being forced to use their body (their blood, organs, their energy and oxygen) to support someone else. And that is not something we do. We don’t force people to donate a kidney to their dying child. We…

Your usual response is perfect. I would also add that the fetus is not a sentient being.. Yet... And that scientifically, we’re asking the equivalent of donating/sharing all your organs for someone else, and we don’t even force corpses to do that. Nor do we legally force parents to donate organs, etc... Yes, the fetus…

“The important question isn’t whether or not the fetus is alive, it’s at what point you think the rights of the fetus outweigh the rights of the mother?”

I don't know if you took a developmental bio class or are just well informed, but that was amazing and I'm giving you a round of Internet applause.

Yeah, I get that it’s not supposed to be scientific, but I’m more comfortable there because it’s harder to refute. Sort of like the death penalty - I’m vehemently anti-death penalty, but when I support my position I generally don’t talk about the morality of murder, or philosophical questions of right and wrong, but…

When someone says “life begins at conception”, try to nail them down on when conception is. Is it when the sperm and egg’s membranes fuse? Because more than 1 spermatozoon can fuse membranes. Is it when the proteases open the way through the protein layer of the egg and the oocyte’s biochemistry changes in such a way…

I think a scientific way to argue against it is to say that an embryo has more in common with a sperm or egg cell than it does a person. Given the right combination of circumstances, those can become a person too - so why draw the line at conception?

Malkovich malkovich, malkovich. Hrmmhrmm excuse me I had something in my throat, I meant to say Drake drake, drake . Drake drake .......drake.

My mum was really upset. Only added to the pain of her newly broken ankle. He called out to her once while stopping at a traffic light back in the 1980s. It was a pretty big deal.

Yeah, definitely. Her features have become more defined with age, for the better.

*nods*

Women don’t need to be beautiful to be desired. And most women know that being too desired does not make for a happy life.

I think she’s more beautiful now than when she was younger.

Uhh, I’m a feminist. Read all the theory and everything. You think this straw feminist would say women aspire to be beautiful?

And doesn’t she look incredible in that leather jacket?