Sorta off topic - how come this website that just published a recipe that sounds great doesn’t have a printer friendly way to print that recipe? Don’t wanna print the photos, just the recipe.

There is a MASSIVE difference between the APS-C sensor size and the 1/2.3" sensor in the SX730. It’s just not possible to get the same results out of the smaller sensor as you can out of the larger ones.

It’s simple: if the kid isn’t moving to the principal’s office, you either move them or call someone (usually the cops) to move them. Which would you prefer?

hm

So what? The fact that you were ‘educated’ on babies and families before having either of their own makes men lazy, uneducated and incompetent at handling family responsibilities? That’s the premise of the article. Women may have a jump start on those topics but that doesn’t mean men don’t catchup. If your spouse…

Men were so offended they went to a less slanted source of writing w/o commenting. Gawker in general has been very man bashy in the last week or two.

Sure. You know what my experience as a married dad in the 21-century has been? I do all of the cooking and half of the housekeeping. Until my sons were old enough, I also did 100% of the laundry and all the outside maintenance on the house. And still found time to be the parent that’s involved in the PTA, goes to…

Agreed. Parts of this have that, “OH, YOUR WIFE IS AWAY SO YOU’RE PLAYING MR. MOM?” vibe. The title itself is pretty insulting and I’m surprised it’s on Lifehacker. Haven’t seen this author before but checking out her other work, it seems more suited to Jezebel than a site like this.

As a dad and frequent critic of the liberal ignorance/condescension I see so much on Lifehacker, I read this article as being pretty neutral. Admittedly, it’s written from a woman’s POV, but I didn’t find anything offensive.

I got your back. I felt the same thing when i read it and i don’thave kids. Somehow the male is always the fuck up after kids are born in the eyes of society.

So, here’s what’s up: for most of recorded history, most fathers have had a certain type of role. It varies from time to time and culture to culture, but some of it’s based in biology, so there are common threads.

It’s valid to say that a guy will have a harder time getting babysitting business due to social perception (you know, due to the kinds of generalizations that are in this article like all men are less likely to be woken up by the sound of a child than by the wind because caveman).

I would say the babysitting experience point is somewhat valid, as a guy who tried to get some of that sweet babysitting and tutoring money when his employment and thus income were... lacking. Nobody trusts his kids with a beardo.

Can someone explain to me why the insulting stereotypes asserted here as general facts are permissible? I am generally really impressed by Lifehacker’s forward thinking, but as a father I found this straight offensive.

Let me tell you a tale of the time I lived with many vegans . . .

This article: written by someone who has never been poor, hungry, and in an unfortunate place where she had to choose which bill couldn’t get paid that month.

Seriously, Five Guys is losing on every front.

#MAGA

“It’s interesting how all of the Trump voters have practically disappeared from the comment sections. Fucking cowards.”

#MAGA
#ignorecrybabies
#skyisnotfalling