This is part and parcel of Whoopie's endless path of defending the indefensible. She has similarly contorted logic and decency to defend Chris Brown and Mel Gibson. I have come to the conclusion that she identifies with the abusers in some way. She's just a towering ass and her nonsensical opinions make it…

I watched the trailer without knowing who was in the film beforehand. I was really hoping Charlize was actually the new Mad Max(ine). That would have been even cooler, imho.

She turned into an incoherent ass and stirred up the most ridiculous nonsense last season. And when confronted would retreat into victim mode, which is just getting tired.

You know what wasn't accidental — the leg throwing. It was wildly obvious that she planned it. She's witless and nuts, and thank goodness she's not coming back — as evidenced by the fact that they didn't give her the "what is she doing now" update at the end.

The problem is that you are simply assuming it's a poverty stricken area. I have not seen any evidence that this area is stricken by poverty or famine or anything else that might be an explanation for such awful behavior.

I don't understand why so many here are leaping to the conclusion that the looters are suffering great need, thereby justifying looting? Because I have seen not one iota of evidence of that.

How about the fact that their families might want the opportunity to have the things that belonged to their loved ones? Does that unearth some sense of this being in fact quite worthy of outrage?

I'm trying to figure out if the post above was a joke or something, because that is plainly what the brain thingy from Miley says.

I'm totally a Dorothy.

I find myself incapable of appreciating this blue hair fad. It makes me feel old and out of it, but I just think it ends up making the wearer's hair look awful. Also, I feel the same way about dub step and somehow I think there is a connection (apart from me being too old to get it).

Fair enough. I certainly agree that focusing solely on her is wrong.

I have to disagree. Fellating 20 men for a bottle of cava is a bigger problem than judging that person for doing it. It's demeaning in every possible way, and just sad for the woman and for the men who participated in it.

I'm completely not buying this. The way surveillance tapes work is that they are copied over unless something happens and you have a need for them. No one would have tapes from 2004. Just would not happen.

I read "Buckingham goddamned Palace" as "Beckingham" and now think that's what they Beckhams should call their home.

I think there is something pathological about the rage engendered by on-line comments. I suspect people are studying this — and if they aren't, they should. I am usually a peaceable person, but I find my own nose gets wildly out of joint sometimes and I can be flooded by anger, over some nonsense a person I will…

Thank you. I have not been this supremely pissed off in a long time and I just am not having it with the bullshit artists who are trying to minimize how seriously awful this decision is.

Yes. Lawyer here. Our entire legal system is premised on "stare decisis," meaning we build from precedent to precedent. If the (il)logic applies here, it can be applied elsewhere and those men are pissing up a tree if they think otherwise.

YES. I have given money to Planned Parenthood, but we really need to start galvanizing and doing more.

What she's saying is that the majority may claim this is a narrow ruling, but that doesn't necessarily make it so.

Wherein we learn that you are a smug, foolish troll who doesn't have the experience to recognize an outcome-determinative ruling reverse engineered to seem like it's just legal interpretation.