The dachshund! (at least for this vote)

You will just have to vote the dacshies in — low slung dogs unite!

Oh, the dachshund OWNS this.

I don't understand this title. At all.

Yeah, I know. She's a stone idiot. I just get anxious about internet vigilatism, even when the person kinda deserves it.

I understand that what this woman said was objectionable, but disseminating her email address is over the line imho.

I recommend going to Gawker. The recap there actually addresses this issue and does it well.

It's because in this petrie dish of a culture, men are studs and women are only there to service them. It's appalling. And Jezebel should be writing about *that* instead of jumping on the denigrate-Sam bandwagon.

I am no fan of Sam, but the beating she gets in these recaps is a bit...disappointing. Where is the discussion of the evident misogyny in that house and the roaring double standard in which everyone kept Ron's infidelities and peccadillos secret, but then acts like Sam is the Whore of Babylon for texting a dude while…

this gal needs an editor.

Yes, I was very moved by the statement of one woman whose sister was viciously murdered that she couldn't understand how visiting the same sort of pain she felt on the family of the murderer by putting him to death would help her.

There is a reason why we can't make policy based on the views of the victims of crime — the death penalty is not about personal vengeance, it is about societal vengeance. And our criminal laws are not written for the guilty, they are actually supposed to be written to try as best as possible to protect the innocently…

I was going to post pretty much the same thing. It's awfully ironic.

That Out Magazine question is inappropriate and pernicious. Asking a straight person what person of the same sex would make them question their sexuality implies that it's somehow a choice to be gay or straight. I get that it was supposed to be lighthearted, but it raises the notion that a gay person could be…

The number of troll responses to this is really depressing.

There's no real connection between the purported reasons why the state of California bans them — danger to local wildlife — and the phobia about germs or smells.

As a lawyer, I always find it curious that people insist that the judicial process take its course before judging. The law is not the only arbiter of what is right and wrong, and the judicial process certainly isn't a substitute for an individual's moral judgment. For example, I feel pretty confident that OJ did it…

I really have a hard time respecting all my Facebook "friends" who post about how awesome he is. It's an idiotic reaction to person careening off the rails of sanity.

Yes. Sadly, there's no limit to self-righteousness when it comes to matters Polanski on this site. It's tedious.

The sourness of these posts is incredibly off-putting, isn't it?