ploppermcplopperstan
Gurble
ploppermcplopperstan

The heartwarming Hobbit trilogy reunion:

The only problem is that most of the targets you mention have multiple warheads aimed at them. So if it’s Time On Target detonation, they will offset the impact points by several kilometers for maximum effectiveness. So the main target would probably be hit with its one designated warhead but also be the centerpoint

That is a 1989-1992 Probe. Had a turbo 2.2L Mazda 4 cyl with 145hp.

Exactly! The title had me but the read was lame. I was 12 when The Day After came out...scared the crap outta me. And at the time it seemed more of a “when” not “if” type of thing.

Jason, it appears you aren’t up on your Probe knowledge. That’s a first gen ford Probe GT on the billboard, (1989-92ish) This would be the late 90's Probe GT

I can’t take Apocalypse survival tips from someone who never lived during the cold war.

Anyone who grew up in the 70's (early 80's?) or earlier already knows this. It’s the stuff my childhood nightmares were made of!

I’ll have to go find my tiny violin.

This is the most over-taking F1 has seen in years...

We should be mad at ourselves for letting the House of Representatives fill up with obstructionist shitheads.

Clinton presided over unparalleled peace and prosperity. Bush allowed the worst terror attack ever on our soil, fought two wars of choice very, very badly, and tanked the economy.

Its worse. He didn’t know what the fuck he was/is doing and has people surrounding him that have connections to these awful, awful people. They pushed them in his face and said “this is the one you want” and he picked them. He wouldn’t know most of those people if they had come up and bit him in his ass. While Trump

He also refused to say he would recuse himself from his current lawsuit were he to head the EPA. Madness.

“Trump Determined To Attack United States”








She was referring to the vandalism, not Gettleman’s hair style.

They meant nothing, really. At the end of the day the election results were driven mostly by: (1) James Comey, and (2) the hacks at the New York Times and Associated Press who spent a year (well, 20 years in the NYT’s case) desperately trying to drag Hillary’s reputation through the mud through non-stories (we don’t

Depends on who’s making that assertion, what elements could or could not be verified by a second source, and the quality of their evidence, whether or not I could publicize all of that evidence legally or not. I think it also matters whether the information is something that is influencing the policy decisions of

There was a lot in the emails (both the Podesta and DNC hack) that were not gossip, but there was a lot that was, one specific example (among many) that jumps to mind is the “her instincts are so suboptimal” rant from Neera Tanden to Podesta that literally speculates as to who was responsible for the timing of a press