i thought his attorney also said that his DNA and fingerprints were all over that garage — he wouldn’t have been able to clean up only her blood that should have been everywhere and left his — don’t think it’s possible she was killed in the garage or ever in it — which means the bullet with her DNA on it (not blood)…

my understanding is that the bullet had her DNA on it not her blood and it could have easily been transfer DNA (if you are for the planting evidence theory). the prosecutor keeps saying in interviews that it was sweat DNA but i don’t know if he said that in court - i’ve read other articles that you can’t tell if DNA…

i think that’s where i’m at - i don’t know if he’s guilty or innocent - but i definitely don’t think he’s guilty beyond a reasonable doubt - if you throw out all of the evidence that the manitowock sherriff’s collected then there’s not much left