@ibro911: That's brilliant, I'm afraid I'm going to steal it :D

@Anonymoose: Was it really worth promoting this?

@max11221: Who are Fast Company anyway? Seems like there name is appropriate (i.e., pulling a fast one).

"four-star chef"

@ITCC: Oh I've played that! Glad you mentioned it I had completely forgotten about it.

@aec007: Cool, could do with a new netbook.

What OS is is running?

@mjschmidt: I was merely attempting to explain what the author meant by "Invading the fourth dimension", i.e. we now have holograms that can change over time, not commenting about whether fixed holograms existed (I suspect they do, having seen them)

@ITCC: Did it move as a result of you moving? In this implementation it just shows you a different view when you move (so appears to be really 3D from 'all' angles), and all of those views can be changed over time (albeit slowly!)

@ITCC: Isn't that the point, that holograms were essentially fixed?

@frederickallen: Isn't that the point, that holograms were essentially fixed?

@snark_attack: Nice job :)

@Arggh! there goes a...snake a snake!: Technically you can if you're not averse to squinting, but it's not very comfy or practical.

@spaghetti335: Wikipedia can explain it better than I can:

@OMG Boots1: If it's anything like similar cameras, it will probably just be setting the aperture appropriately, rather than doing anything nasty.

@ivan-the-terrible: It's comparable. Better is quite subjective, though.

Almost dropped my coffee, YAY! Been waiting for this for ages :)

@moop2000: That article is oddly fascinating.

@chasper: Fair point.

@bhtooefr: Yeah they do that here too, but they still have the 'unhealthy' stuff.