pizzapartymadness
pizzapartymadness
pizzapartymadness

My biggest takeaway from this is that apparently Michael Strahan is a talk show host now?

And btw they have over 2600 locations over 47 states, so shouldn’t be too hard to find once you understand how they operate (out of convenience stores and gas stations)

I’m still waiting for you guys to review Krispy Krunchy Chicken. Not only is their business model unique, but they have the best bone-in fried chicken, imo.

Cap Snaffler. Snafflers caps off any size jug, bottle, or jar. And it really, really works.

Except he’s not ever portrayed in that way. It’s not like there’s a scene of him breaking someone’s legs for owing money.

I mean if I still had all my old cartridges I’d definitely want this. Hell, I don’t have them all and I want this (just not enough to justify buying them).

I guess, but even so, it seems like a strange takeaway. Gatsby is meant to be likeable. His crimes seem mostly to with things like gambling and bootlegging. He’s not shown to be ruthless or cruel. He’s not exactly a paragon of virtue, but to describe him as a parallel to Logan Roy seems completely off base.

I’m aware he’s a criminal, but this is the first time I’ve ever heard someone describe the character as evil. The reader is meant to be sympathetic towards him. His greatest weaknesses have nothing to do with his involvement with organized crime.

Any evidence of the urine? Sounds like a story he made up to justify his being naked.

It was foreshadowed in a previous episode. Caroline mentions it in the conversation with Shiv (the same one where she says she shouldn’t have had kids).

Edit: Was Gatsby supposed to be considered evil?

I will say that given it seemed necessary to have a significant figure go down and take responsibility for the cruise affairs and that Kendall was supposed to be doing significant time in prison, it does seem strange that it just fizzled to nothing more than a fine. Like what?

If the biggest reason you have that the episode is bad is that it doesn’t match the continuity then you have a bad take.

Culkin’s quotes don’t even seem that bad from what I recall, but the article definitely couches them in such a manner to imply negativity.

Did anyone ever see that movie Warhorse? Looked bad.

You’re afraid you’re going to get sucked out!

They need to start talking about the damn heron marked sword for one thing. Digging into Rand’s origins is how you make him a more interesting character.

[possibly some cryptic book spoilers below]

Would walkie talkies work?

The article makes this exact reference.