pitseleh0
pitseleh0
pitseleh0

So far it isn't that bad. In fact in a lot of ways it is easier.

Continuing my Pacifist/Foxiest playthrough of Deus Ex last night. I played and got sucked in and never stopped. I wanted to, but I didn't. I am hooked.

I turned Immortals off. It was just too...too... stupid.

Yeah, and you can't really damage the thing by cleaning it. It is soft and you can squish it and it is fine. Part of the design made it soft so if you smack your friend in the head accidentally you wouldn't kill him.

Right, I get that, but it isn't like the maps alone are no work. That is work in of itself, so I don't buy that willing to do some work for free but not other work holds up (or at least not charging the "going rate" of $15 for a FPS add on). But if we say that the other perks make up for the difference (basically I am

Well it's basically gotten no press. Nobody knows it is coming out. Look at it, launching around E3 with basically no competition and still nobody knows about it.

This is why I ignore trash talkers. People say that it is normal in competition but I disagree. Is it prevalent in competition, most definitely, but that does not make it normal (i.e. approved of and acceptable).

I don't have one announcement I would like to hear. I do have one concept I would like to hear across the board from all companies.

That's a valid opinion. I don't argue against it. But the flip side to the coin is that principle would save you $60 rather than $10-15. If EA didn't falter on it's principle, those map packs you are so eager about would be free.

Here is the deal people.

I agree with you premise that "make a fun game" should come long before "make a good looking game" but do the two have to be mutually exclusive? You speak like all good looking games are bad. They are not, just like not all games that don't have photo realistic graphics are good. Or like all good looking games were

I would ask what 360 games interest you. That is your deciding factor.

Nope. I initially was going to sneak up and do a non lethal take down on the first 2 guys, but then I got spotted so I just ran like a sissy. Then on the second batch of guys who are much more aggressive and alert (and can see you outside through the window as I find out) I ran again. From there on out I did very well

What exactly do you want done to it?

I would recommend Mafia 2. It is not an open world game. It is set up like one, but it is really a linear game and there is nothing really to do other than the main story. But the main story is pretty darn good. On a sale like this it is totally worth it.

Or if you have the money to, buy 3 or 4 of them and it pays for your PS+ membership cost.

Actually, there were a handful of "not kept" shortcomings on that list. Many of them are not 1st party games but some of them are. But I agree with you that saying "Promise Kept/Not Kept" is sort of stupid. It misses the point of E3. They stand up and say it has been great, and these are the things we are working

Ok so I bought Deus Ex HR when it came out (Amazon had that amazing $35 sale) and I played it a bit, but then stopped because I got caught up in other games. I went back once, and really didn't stick with it because I forgot all the controls and such.

Ehrand describes it very well. The game is remarkably good, but it is very linear so don't expect a big experience out of it. It is "short" in the sense that it is basically a campaign with really no side missions to speak of (not literally but pretty darn close). For $15 or $20 it is a great game. I never played the

Not if they are "complete" packs that have all the DLC and such. There are not enough Vita games, let alone with DLC to make it a value. Besides, they are trying to spur interest in older games, not the new stuff.