Who said it was department wide?

How do you know that? How about a q tip? The EDTA test will eventually be proven to be complete BS.

The thought is that it may have contaminated potential DNA evidence. Apparently you can only do one or the other. At least that's what I've heard.

Try reddit. They have tons of folks delving into every detail of the series. Mam …

In that county, even the less intelligent folks have Dexter-like blood spatter skills, yet forget to get rid of the vehicle.

And do what? Tell them their fridge is running … down the street? I don't think taking our frustration out on those a##holes would do anybody any good.

… And have Kratz state emphatically that ONE person alone was responsible for this crime at Steve's trial, then turn around and PERSONALLY railroad Brendan. Just despicable … and how the citizens of that county couldn't see that is beyond comprehension.

They should have had the FBI lab guy spell out his exact procedure for testing, then the defence could have had a chemist explain precisely how it was inadequate.

I think he was chosen because he had an interest in polishing his communication skills. I hope that doesn't sound too insensitive… Judging by the the looks of puzzlement shown by the family during the trial, when a lot of questionable evidence was being presented, they did seem to show some doubt. But never showed it…

I believe he heard his version second hand, if I'm not mistaken. If I may ask, is that your only question regarding the possibility of his innocence?

SPOILER (PERHAPS): The tampering and planting of the key is interesting to me. Why would the cops need to scrub the key before they placed Steve's DNA on it, if indeed, they did so? Wouldn't it make more sense to leave the victim's DNA on there, then add some of Steve's? I know Steve isn't too bright, but you would…