Am I supposed to take them at their word still when there is ample proof out there that shows they've been lying through their teeth?
Pitchguest
pitchguest--disqus
But you're willing to believe Gamergate is a 4chan conspiracy, #NotYourShield is a bunch of sockpuppets and Gamergate themselves a "hate group" based on … fuck all. Even though I haven't even said anything remotely similar to Holocaust denial (what is wrong with you?), evidently the anti-GG contingent aren't so wont…
Yes, I'm sure you have. Credible sources, like Wikipedia. Whose article on the Gamergate controversy once had an editor who accepted donations from noted anti-GG subreddit GamerGhazi, and currently has an editor that thinks Gamergate is a terrorist organisation. That's "credible" for you.
Sigh.
This is insanity. I'm telling you to look at the evidence and you tell me to 'keep digging that hole.' Are you interested in the facts or not? Like, what are you talking about? Do you think I'm just making these things up from wholecloth? Yes, several sources indicate that Zoe Quinn and Brianna Wu lied about being…
Right, she calls herself a feminist, she identifies as a feminist but other, er, 'feminists' say she's either a "bad" feminist or not a feminist at all. You can make the claim that "Sommers is an infamous, hardcore misogynist" (please water down the word 'misogynist' some more, please do) but you sure can't prove it.
It's more likely than you think. Just look at some feminists' reaction to Christina Hoff Sommers, or the women who not only say they support Gamergate but also happen to be feminists. They get called 'fake', they get accused of 'internalising their misogyny'. If that's not trying to demonstrate their ideological…
But they never WERE driven out of their homes. You can easily check this yourself. Instead you've decided to 'listen and believe', because that's what sceptics do, apparently. It's 'true' because they say its true. Meanwhile, people meticulously scrutinized their words, their evidence (or lack thereof), and found it…
If a conversation is based on falsehoods and misinformation, then the conversation is had on false pretenses. I would rather Sarkeesian were honest in her critique (or whine, as I deem it) rather than fabricate bullshit points about Hitman ("the player is supposed to derive a perverse sexual pleasure from desecrating…
Apart from the time rewind mechanic (which has already been done), what is Life Is Strange? A mediocre high school simulator with terrible, awkward, cringeworthy dialogue, in which the director tries to get into the mind of a teenager and fails miserably (I refer to you the "skater boy" from Episode 1 and say no more)…
Please. Anita Sarkeesian's "critique" is amateurish at best, whiny at worst.
Ninja'ed by six hours. Still, it's hilarious that she actually went with child molesters. That's a spectacular own goal if I ever saw one.
Yes, she did, and no, they didn't. Sooner or later, you people have to realise that you can't keep lying your way through life. When Gamergate was in its infancy, and still had their hands full with Polygon, Kotaku, Gawker, et al, two people decided to get in on the action, because obviously they saw profit in the…