Oh, I somehow missed that you’re a troll! Pardon. Carry on.

Sure, POC talking about exclusion and racism are the real problem.

You mean a website for white women? No poc allowed unless they don't bother the white women by daring to speak about white privilege?

I guess “identity politics” is anything that is not about white people, or that acknowledges that POC exist and have a different experience in the world than do white people?

It’s sexist for him, a politician, to attempt to leverage his political support into influence on a political platform? Not a very strong take, kid. Bad post.

he’s won by shifting the conversation in the Democratic party to the left-think about his arguments about social security, banks, public education, etc.

Oh, honestly. Fuck off with your “#rollingstone #duke” bullshit.

The problem with constantly mentioning Rolling Stone and Duke is they indicate how rare false allegations are. People always mention these same few cases over and over to show that false allegations happen. But when you consider that tens of thousands of domestic violence incidents and rapes are reported to police…

Yeah, I think he means objectification not sexism, but his point is very valid. And it totally sucks to be objectified so Jon Snow, for once, you kinda know something maybe?

Thank you. This is exactly correct. He should not be mocked for having a problem with being objectified. It’s really weird that this is happening to him, and that the mockery is coming from feminist quarters.

Hmmm, I agree that he meant objectification. Which, yeah, probably sucks and feels icky. If you look at what he said, he’s not complaining of being discriminated against, he’s just being sick of being asked to take his shirt off. Sexism was definitely the wrong word to use. It’s a shame, because looking at the rest of…

I think he needs to flesh out his ideas more, but if someone says they feel uncomfortable or pressured into undressing to stay employed, I think those feelings are valid and I encourage them to speak up about it, regardless of gender. Even if what he said is rather clumsy, there is a point there that’s worth pursuing.…

That’s... What? Women have, and frequently exercise, that option. Of all the things women are denied in society, the right to stop acting because they’re being objectified is not one of them. Of course, nobody should have to stop acting for this reason, but the option exists, equally, for all parties concerned.

That he is objectified is not necessarily sexism, depending on any number of contextualizing factors... but that people, including supposed feminists, see fit to mock him for not enjoying being objectified, and think he should just suck it up and not complain, because he’s a man and women have it worse, is absolutely,…

I’m not sure the best way to fight the patriarchy is to casually devalue the fact that it adversely affects men as well.

What you say sounds very righteous, until you notice the flaw in its logic.

“Just stop, stop and think about what other people are telling you, people who lived through the controversies and look inside, and prepare to consider the possibility that your superficial impression might be wrong about their life experiences.”

“I was born and raised in Hong Kong, and fled in 97 when the handover happened.” So you are a sinophobic and you have compare Modern day China to “just imagine the Nazi came back”? did Beijing put “hongkongers” in camp and gas chamber?

You are wrong. It’s more like If the US school system suddenly started dropping some of the Spanish classes in favor of English classes, and people in Texas suddenly protest against English invasion.

It’s the chinese language’s limitation. they can’t write pikachu in chinese letters.