It’s hard to imagine what that groundhog could have done to those innocent motorists if the cop hadn’t responded in the nick of time.

People are “laying out uncomfortable truths” about the conflict between a modern Islam and the tenets of feminism literally all the time. You do it, with a proposed identity you believe to be a “keen infiltration”, and you view it as a veritable art form. Motherfucker, I’ve been “trolling” Jezebel with…

Seriously, though, what you call “trolling” is just one of three or four different arguments that people on Jezebel already present to one another. What if you’re not “trolling”, but instead “engaging in conversations” of the same variety you seem to think are incapable of existing otherwise. Without you around,…

It’s actually much weirder to not use the name of the product, when it’s just “Part 2”. It’s not like the name is “thelast(us)][dx”.

If these morons ignored it, and now they’re being hurt, fuck them.

They got conned, but we’re all paying for it.

Anyone aware of all these facts and still abiding by Trump’s decisions is nothing short of a hypocrite. But even now, the media is grooming Trump in such a way as to improve his public image before he takes office. They’re attempting to control how Trump is viewed, and present him in a way that has exactly two…

I agree, to a point. But I also think many of the 27% of our nation that voted for Trump were duped. Just straight-up duped: Deceived and misinformed by a strategy—both domestic and foreign—to muddy the waters and make people vote for things that would directly harm them.

Yeah, these “lock her up” people are the weirdest of the bunch. If that was the only thing they expected from a Trump administration—to jail a person that lost an electoral contest—they are really the weirdest kind of nutballs.

We should’ve been honest with understanding why Trump’s supporters were voting the way that they were. They were, in fact, demanding a change. We can shout about how all the changes they expected were inhuman and evil. Sure, the changes many of them voted for were driven by fears and hatred, but not all of them. You…

I hope this is a gag. That post was about Bieber’s wax figurine, which the dude himself then proceeds to touch in a fairly non-sexual fashion.

He only seems sane by comparison. That’s basically the goal of the great 2016 political shift to the right. Mitt may well wind up as the best we’ll get. Hopefully he and his right-wing crew will inspire some backlash during the 2018 midterms, assuming there’s anything salvageable from the left by the time we get…

Nah. I think our concern for civil rights would have better won the election, if it was discussed more often and in more concrete terms. But I think you’re talking about the election, because... something? Obviously we don’t know much about each other.

I don’t see any reason why the panel can’t determine if something is sexist or not. I don’t know anything about their ideology, their humanity, or their intellect on these sorts of issues.

“It’s ridiculous for a group of men to declare whether something is sexist”

Sorry, had to put in a day of work. I’m not entirely sure what a third party presidential victory looks like in the United States, because it’s been a while, hasn’t it? I know what it looks like in other democracies. The US may not be as good as other democracies, at representing the desires of the public.

I’m not really making that argument. I’m making the argument that it’s good to have helpful liberals around. Stein isn’t the villain the centrist Democrats are making her out to be. Liberals can help you win elections, sure, but they can also help you form a more perfect governance. That can happen whether or not…

This theory that the DNC has a candidate and everyone else is an infiltrator just doesn’t work for me. The notion that liberalism is an invasive species in the Democratic Party is also one I disagree with. So then—like now—you’re saying liberals (sure, like Sanders) should “get their own party!”. And then a liberal…

Nah. During the primaries, Democratic centrists said “Get your own party!” to the liberals.

Probably not. My point is that the DNC’s leadership was composed entirely of centrists like Wasserman-Schultz. No one wants to admit the DNC made an error regarding with whom it associated.