Wow. Arguing against criticism of NASCAR’s racism and misogyny with overt racism and misogyny, eh? Well, aren’t you a smart feller?

Well-said, Ballaban. NASCAR inserting itself into the biggest political shit show of my middle-aged lifetime to endorse a racist perversion is way beyond mere “epic blunder.” Even NASCAR’s conservative base are aghast at such a foolish decision.

Honda announced their flying pig program suffered setbacks and won’t get airborn until “NSX’s sell.”

Here’s some advice picked up from experience: Forget Austin and go to the race in Canada. Better atmosphere, fewer rip offs, nicer people, less cost, more fun...

You wish. Nothing stops enormous profit potential in this country. Self-driven cars are now inevitable and they’ll justify them in *decreased* fatalities, among other things.

Exactly. This is like Texas-league shenanigans.

This is what happens when you read Tavarish posts and think, “yeah, living in a crap place with dead vehicles in the yard and no reliable transportation is a lifestyle I can rock.”

Thank you. Why does this guy not understand the very rules he’s posting?!

Okay, you have clearly never been on track and you’re being disingenuous in your foolish argument. Everyone knows you can’t push a car NEXT TO YOU off track: that’s the entire basis of “racing room.” That was obviously not the case here (Davison was behind, without overlap, and struck Long from behind where racing…

How can you not read or understand the rules you yourself are posting? This is racing 101 stuff here. Cars ahead are entitled to defend. Cars behind/passing must do so safely. Striking a car — from behind — while doing so are penalized.

Tough luck buddy. Since they don’t serve food on planes anymore and since McClown’s is the only thing next to the gate, crappy fast food smells are here to stay.

This Tavarish guy is dragging Jalopnik down. It's just one idiotic post after another with him. Please, Jalopnik, fire this guy and move on.

So what? We should let them keep and benefit from ill-gotten gains from his enormous criminal theft?

YOU TAKE THAT BACK, LOSER! FRUITY PEBBLES IS THE CEREAL OF THE GODS!!!

Only he didn’t build squat — He licensed his name to someone who did. His holdings are relatively tiny and he lives on the income.

Yup, it changes fast too. Testarossas were $45k three years ago. No more...

Yes, but having turned 30, it’s begun to turn “classic.” Five years ago, it was just an old used car. Such is the march of time. It’s the reason why Baby Boomers who couldn’t afford or didn’t have time to restore their old cars often ended up with sought-after gems and barn finds!

Absolutely. I follow this stuff and you can basically track wealth concentration and “consumer confidence” of the rich by blue-chip classic car prices. A Ferrari 330 GTC could be had all day for under $100k in the early to mid-00's. Now, $850-950k might get you a good one. That’s loose money and perverse tax policy at…

They had just touched six figures ten or so years ago. I think it was a Gooding & Co auction I was at where everyone rolled their eyes and snickered when it went for something like $110k.

No, they’re comically small. Impossible for 6+ footers to drive.