piglet2
BaronessVonSchnufflehund
piglet2

I seriously find that one of the most disgusting things, like if you want to avoid premarital sex and expect the same of your wife that's one thing but to expect your wife to be some pure angel while you have done whatever you want is so incredibly gross. What did you say???

When I had it done:

I did stand up at the bar and yell "TODAY, I AM A WOMAN!" and got a free beer for it.

You should have used the opportunity to ask random women if they had an extra pad to spare.

I feel like I'm the rare person who given a choice between a regular potato and a GMO potato would choose the GMO variety even if I didn't know what the specific GM was. It's likely it was done for a reason related to flavor enhancement, pest resistance, greater yield or longer shelf life. All being good qualities

This is how I feel. Monsanto may be evil, but that doesn't mean that GMO's as a concept are evil. Do we apply this logic to any other issue? As progressives, we get furious when conservatives look at that one crazy abortion doctor in Philadelphia and smugly go, "see? All abortion is evil!" Why the hell does it make

This saddens me.

You could not be more right. The loony left and the loony right are making whoopie.

This really exemplifies the BS of being against GMOs. These were designed to decrease levels of a carcinogen! While it's probably not a significant decrease in most people's diets, it is at least a positive improvement. And yet everyone focuses on the fact that it's a GMO... though GMOs have never been shown to

It's not a dodge. Until I see the tiniest shred of scientific evidence Innate potatoes are unsafe, I'm going to believe they're safe.

I trust the overwhelming scientific consensus that GMO's are safe, considering we've been eating them for 20 years and we have enough of a data set to notice significant health issues.

Wild mushroom and wild fish only diet! You'd lose tons of weight. Take that, smug paleo people!

I'd like to see someone really try to eat 100% non-GMO food. Like, food that has had no human influence in its development. Would that leave anything?

Call me crazy but isn't a crop that's less likely to cause cancer a good thing?

yes but there is no reason to label them, so that ends up just as anti-science.

Jesus Christ. And let me guess, some of these Anti-GMO people are also Anti-Vaxxers...

Ah, the auto-science hysteria pops up again. Rather than take advantage of science, McDonalds kowtows to the idiocy of the "GMOS ARE EVIL" crowd.

This is like burning down a state forest and planting a shrub.