I mean , he didn’t support the invasion of Ukraine , or start screaming Anti-Semitic stuff , so for a chess player that’s pretty good going!
I mean , he didn’t support the invasion of Ukraine , or start screaming Anti-Semitic stuff , so for a chess player that’s pretty good going!
I think your grammar teacher would be more concerned about the rogue comma you threw in there after ‘explode’ for no apparent reason.
Her head also might explode if she saw you using a comma after a subordinating conjunction.
Nope. It is and has been valid, even by prescriptivist rules.
Your grammar teacher’s head would explode at this comment, with you for some reason taking issue with the singular gender-neutral version of “they”.
Uh...yes you can? Language does that constantly. You find it weird now, but in a few more decades no one will bat an eye because language is constantly evolving.
They/Them/Their have been used as singular gender-neutral pronouns for decades. Don’t know the person’s gender or talking about “the player”, use they/them/their.
Because crypto fucking sucks and the only people that think otherwise are the ones buying into the scheme?
because crypto is a scam.
By
Or...just don’t play them
I…think you missed the point.
What do you deem an “emotional argument”, and why?
I’d like to hear a non-crackpot or buzzword filled argument in favor of NFTs, because I’m not sure what that would be.
Wait actual question though, why in the world would anybody named Indiana Black choose to go by ‘Froskurinn’ when she could instead go by ‘Indiana Black’?
I encourage every punch to their pocketbook.
yeah, we said woman. Because she is.
I’m sure it has nothing to do with how our educational system discriminates between boys and girls in teaching.
“You’re soooo brave”.