If you’re going to name your program Be Best, I’d consider creating a logo that wouldn’t get a second grader an F in penmanship.
If you’re going to name your program Be Best, I’d consider creating a logo that wouldn’t get a second grader an F in penmanship.
It was a pretty good site until I popped into the older age bracket and the guys interested disappeared. They clearly were NOT showing guys anybody outside of their preferred age and guys in their thirties and forties were all clearly choosing to date no one older than 34. I think it was matchmaker or match.
Guys like you certainly exist (and huzzah!), but it true that they’re usually not as apparent as the young guys and older guys who seem to find women between about 35 and 45 irresistible. A guy in his 40s (online particularly) looking to date women in the same age range is going to be welcomed with literal open arms.
Yup, this guy is either straight out asking women to comment on his size or is so transparently desperate for it that they’re saying the most obvious thing to give him a boost. With the pump info, I’m guessing they’re also possibly trying to keep him hard or trying to get him to finish already with some blatant ego…
It doesn’t effect yor mortgage, but it effects your home value, which is probably fine as long as you sell at the right time and buy cheaper. It does effect your property taxes if values are rising. It could also clobber you if new zoning laws come in and cause your home value to drop to a point lower than you…
Paying off porn stars during your presidential campaign does not fall under any sort of, “things that I don’t follow closely because of my business empire.” There is no credibility to a claim that a porn star independently went to Trump’s shady fixer lawyer and that he paid her off without confirming, discussing, and…
Great writing and argument! I haven’t read anything as hilarious and resonating as, “he is an obsequious slimeball even more slovenly with language than his forebears were in the dispensation of their chromosomes.” in at least ten years. Thank you as I desperately needed a good laugh today.
Exactly! Men commit the vast majority of emotion driven crimes like murder and assault, yet it’s women’s emotions he has a problem with? It’s bizarre how men categorize rage and anger as not emotional, while crying or trying to discuss a difference of opinion is too over the top to make rational thought possible in…
The WHCA and media personalities are doing a pretty good job of disingenuously keeping the news cycle focused on the (totally legitimate) criticisms of SHS to keep everyone from talking about her totally legitimate and scorching criticisms of themselves. We should all be coming at them with those criticisms.
very true
good point
If he knew how to use a computer he could have ordered something, but 2018 we have a president who doesn’t use computers.
You know, I gotta say, I think even republicans would reject someone who abused dogs, though I would have said that about a really clear pedophile a year ago and would have been wrong...so....
Honestly, most people care about dogs more than other people. I could see a nazi flag waving MF absolutely going nuts on a someone who abandoned dogs (though a Nazi would be unlikely to vote for an Indian American guy anyway).
He’s too busy tweeting that about his doc, Ronny Jackson today. Maybe tomorrow- unless he’s on to Kanye by then. There’s a long line of dudes being ‘unfairly’ treated by the fake news and evil US justice system in front of Cosby at the moment. /s
They have been consistently shown to not be very accurate at all-which is why you generally can’t use them in court. They are particularly prone to false positives and are also pretty easy to beat by anyone who wants to spend 15 minutes on the internet reading up on it.
“They can be an investigative tool. Not the test itself but how someone reacts to being asked to take one.”
LOL, yeah, I’m the one coming off as the ignorant asshole here.
Well, there’s a real zinger. I don’t know how I’ll come back from that but I suppose it’s because you don’t have a substantive comeback.
It is not an insult to ask you to think about the fact that you almost certainly DON’T teach fascism in the same way that you teach slavery. Your response suggests that you believe fascism is indefensible and that slavery is not indefensible.