I honestly don’t know what else you want me to say.

This. I think viewing them as two different experiences is, at least from a critical perspective, a very poor idea.

Well, a person who plays the Battlefield franchise, should know what kind of “fun” to expect from the multiplayer. If you want to go for realism and simulation, there’s other niche games for that.

The moment DICE announced their take on WW1 with BF1, people instantly got offended because of the subject matter. I just don’t understand how far a company has to go to not offend somebody on the internet, especially for an event that happened ~100 years ago.

I just don’t see why a different tone between the two is a problem if you’re viewing each as its own separate experience. The “tone” of multiplayer is always going to be different from a structured single-player campaign.

The multiplayer entirely undermines this message.