@TehBeardMan: True, but it will slowly become less and less relevant as your situation changes, and your facebook doesn't.
@TehBeardMan: True, but it will slowly become less and less relevant as your situation changes, and your facebook doesn't.
@overzeetop001: Oh, well that's far too much :'(!
@bonedog73: I love foobar. It's minimalist enough that when I started with it, I was very happy with it's ability to "just play music, no stupid skins or useless music management features my library isn't big enough to need", and extensible enough that as I wanted more, it could deliver. Now it has a reasonably pretty…
Ok, got it. Foobar2000, hoorah!
Absolutely, assuming it's open to we british heathen and I could watch pretty much any show (within reason, of course. I'll let it off if it doesn't have an obscure anime), and it was decent quality (720p minimum), I'd totally pay a fiver a month.
@Jimmy From The Block: I think the whole read write web facebook login thing proves that a lot of FB's users wouldn't understand how their internet engine could spy their privacies anyway.
WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
Great tip!
@TheFu: Indeed, I'm more than happy to rely on google and dropbox for personal work and backup, but for anything vaguely important? I'll stick local.
@Richard E. Martin: If they didn't want iPhone OS, they shouldn't have bought an iPhone. I mean, it's awesome that it can be done, I'm just not seeing the use.
@DesignHobo: That doesn't excuse them from mining what information you do give them for profit.
@HeartBurnKid: Agent of R.O.A.C.H.: Good point, well made.
Why not just get an android phone? It'd be less expensive!
@atomix: Well... yeah. This was a serious error of judgement, however you spin it.
@Buster Friendly: it doesn't do anything now, but if you exclude it from scanning, you can be pretty darn sure it'll be doing something soon :P
@Buster Friendly: Because if I was going to write a virus, I'd insert it into a "magical protected antiviruses can't touch this" file faster than you can blink :P
Nicely done. I'd blame them, but honestly, it's probably not their fault, the scale of the task they're trying to perform is immense. Detecting applications that in all likelyhood nobody else has -ever- reported and stopping it as it tries to "do something bad" is almost impossible. People who shout at AV's for being…
@gburke: Indeed, as far as I can tell it simply didn't track the delete, so when I hit undo it un-copied the files. Then when I hit redo, it tried to re-copy the files. The files which no longer existed :(
@supergibbs: The two UIs may look similar, but like many things that XP and Win7 "share", Win7's actually works :P
@TheFu: That's very true, and source being nicked could indeed open up a large vulnerability, but it's not an "oh god, we'd better stop using this now!" scale disaster.