Yes, please, tell me more about how I can't possibly discuss the objectification of males in media and the effects that has on society because females are the only ones with issues being inflicted upon them due to their objectification in media.

Whereas for killing men in games there's usually no penalty, and for the most part you're rewarded for doing so. The only games where you're even nudged away from casually ending a small town's worth of men are games where there's a mission parameter that fails the mission if you kill civilians.

It'd be great if women weren't portrayed as victims so much.

NO MORE FUCKING ESCORT MISSIONS.

Well, it's a kids TV show from my childhood, so...probably?

I know you were joking, but you're actually pretty accurate in that this is indeed how trolls talk. Specifically, the Rottentrolls:

I know you were joking, but you're actually pretty accurate in that this is indeed how trolls talk. Specifically, the Rottentrolls:

Yep, this is for real. The suit, which you can read below, alleges that Sony misled gamers with the newest Killzone by using technology to replicate high-resolution graphics instead of actually providing them.

"xbox loyalists"

Just take a second to reflect on that phrase.

I accept rides from friendly strangers, then cook a grenade for too long.

The art style sort of looks like a terrible stylised version of GTA's art.

Wasn't Rush in Bad Company basically criminals vs. criminals? Even your commander on the American side tended to say things like "God damn it, they're gonna get my gold. I mean our gold! Ours!" and stuff. I'm paraphrasing, but still...

I'm a furry, and I'm a sexual deviant. Seriously, foxes are one of the tamest examples of furry smut media around.

Wait.

PMC?
All black?
Obsession with future tech?
Fetish for absurdly heavy armour?

That sounds a lot like Raven. Maybe the enemies in this are SVER, because we all know how much CoD hates people from Asia.

The funny thing is that despite all the crashes and glitches, I still prefer playing Battlefield over Call of Duty. Conquest on Naval Strike is a lot of fun, and that one map with the hill and cannons I can't remember the name of might just be the best TDM map ever for sniping because it's simultaneously really good…

Surprisingly enough, I have other things to do with my time, and discussions with people on video game websites are rarely at the forefront of my mind. I don't see a connection between severe anxiety, paranoia, intrusive thoughts, and choosing to beat a game really fast in your free time.

So, the concept of fun eludes you? Activities need objective benefits to be considered worthwhile? If that's the case, why on Earth are you anywhere *near* a video games site?

Depends on what sickens you. There are things I see that would sicken others, and...well, there's not really anything that would make me feel queasy.

Maybe porn directed by David Lynch.

No, no there isn't. If "investing thousands of hours into breaking arbitrary records" is what they enjoy, then so be it. Are you also going to criticise people who have swimming races and those who build tiny model ships in glass bottles for their worthless pursuits? How about Golf? Thousands of people all over the…

So, people shouldn't use their free time to do stuff they enjoy? They should be dedicating 100% of their time to constructive pursuits that enable them to play the holier-than-thou card in online discussions?