Uh, no, but maybe a revamp of the Dino Crisis series, or better yet, a proper sequel to Dino Crisis 2.
Uh, no, but maybe a revamp of the Dino Crisis series, or better yet, a proper sequel to Dino Crisis 2.
I agree, it's the WWII game genre of the contemporary games era.
The Last of Us wasn't really about zombies though, it was focused primarily upon the interaction between the two lead characters and how the threat from other people was just as bad if not worse than the threat faced from the infected.
This is inevitably going to be pretty much just another mindless zombie game. You…
Is it not possible for an image to stay on screen for more than a split-second?
Well, here's what you want to do:
For both crates, just spam assault and recon - there's not much point in using anything else. Recon to get behind them and set up beacons, Assault for rushing the crates and reviving downed team mates. Also: smoke is your friend. If people do suicide charge, then use them as a decoy…
Each predator has preferred food sources, and the idea that they're always hungry and just eat everything in sight is absurd bullshit propagated by movies and television. Some species of shark, for example, do not actively hunt humans, and it is theorised that most attacks on surfers are due to a case of mistaken…
Yeah, it's almost as though saying that "the complaining was one of those Stupid Parrot things geeks do on the internet out of reflex" implied that you think everyone with a conflicting opinion is wrong.
The closest they came to that was in Battlefield 2: Special Forces, where there was an SAS assault on an airbase, where the primary spawn point for the SAS soldiers was above the airfield where they'd parachute in under cover of night.
What?
How?
Or maybe it's a matter of opinion, and you're one of those nerds on the internet who thinks yours is objective fact...
In Rush, we took to driving the Humvee off the edge. I always did it to this tune:
Show me a dinosaur that has eaten a human while that human was on the toilet, and no, movies don't count. I have an argument for the negative as long as you are unable to support your assertion of the positive.
Humans are animals, and you're assuming that animals just do whatever they feel like at the time. Pack animals like Wolves have evolved complex social orders in which they obey hierarchies similar to military command structures, and this behaviour is seen with even more complexity in other animals like primates and…
Negative. That's racial profiling and I do not appreciate it. A Utahraptor is no more likely to eat you than a black person is to rob you.
But you wouldn't necessarily be eaten by dinosaurs while taking a shit - hell, you could be massaged by a utahraptor while taking a shit, as two oviraptors danced for your amusement.
Are you seriously suggesting that wouldn't be better than just taking a shit alone?
I think you're going for Abstract Expressionism more, because Mirror's Edge could be considered modern art, bearing in mind that "modern art" spans about a century of art evolution. Although I fully understand your general message.
The Incredible Hulk - a scrawny, clever white dude has a problem where he transforms into a muscled, dimwitted coloured man whenever he gets angry.
"I will also, never, help a White person. I'll gleefully watch as you struggle."
You'll never help another human based on the colour of their skin?
Really?