Which she already settled out of court, got money for, and closed 12 years ago.

The “new incident” being his mention of what happened in his book, which she then sued for, and then had another out of court settlement for. So now she can sue because she sued based off of another lawsuit that was 12 years ago?

I don’t see the relevance other than Peyton is in the spotlight and she sees dollar signs.

tl;dr: