Not in the gaming scene there isn’t.

What about the “Worst Customer Service” Award?

Everyone will still praise it as an 21/10 masterpiece just because his name is on it. Look at MGSV.

if by “for all intents and purposes” you mean “in my pills and cheap-whiskey fueled fever dreams”

Because cybersecurity - and laws that stem from those efforts that affect technology, like SOPA and PIPA - aren’t tech news? Please. If you want to read tech reviews, CNET is over there waiting for you like a melted vanilla ice cream.

Spoiler alert: it’s not going to get better for them. It’s been downhill for them since the Reagan administration, but they keep voting for the folks that ship their jobs overseas, bankrupt their pensions, pull their social safety nets, etc. Asking for sympathy while shooting yourself in the foot really only…

Yeah, “teasing us with timeline BS” is a misleading headline. We’re teasing ourselves with a common theory. That doesn’t mean the show is. It’s a common issue of internet fanbases: We come up with a million theories for any show that doesn’t play its hand immediately. If only a single one of those is right, it was…

Yep. At this point in the show there is precisely zero canon supported evidence of the ‘multiple timelines’ theory. And really, the basis of those theories are easily explainable within the confines of Westworld. Why haven’t certain guests met? Its a park hundreds of thousands of acres large, at a bare minimum, where…

You are definitely not. There is a slightly less loud community of anti-truthers out there who are sick and tired of people trying to wedge their head-canon into shows without any actual in-show evidence. It’s irritating and it absolutely ruins the discussion of the finer points of this show.

Am i the only one who thinks the different timeline theories is completely a matter of fan projection on the show? Like, I can kinda-sorta see how you can look at the different plots as they unfold and make up the theory but I just am not seeing the show itself as actively courting it. If you’re looking for a reason…

Why blame the show for timeline theories? It’s fans who are cooking those up, not the writers.

That game is so easy to defend I like, don’t even know how you exist.

“[E]verything depends on one’s assumptions, but I think that our assumptions—a Clinton lead, sure, but high uncertainty—has repeatedly been validated by the evidence we’ve seen over the course of the past several months,” Silver told Politico in a story published today. “The idea that she’s a prohibitive, 95…

I don’t hate MS. There are games that support crossplay between MS services and Steam already, so the issue obviously lies with the publisher.

Im with ya. I dont get how you could be so convoluted to decide this is a microsoft decision. Why in the world would the put that restriction on the game? If anything that HURTS sales.

My goodness some people in the comments ....... learn to read ? or is it just fun to hate on Microsoft???

so your opinion, based on nothing but unsupported assumptions is more likely than something an actual spokesperson said?

ok.

I think you missed the part where Microsoft said that it was up to Activision to support this.

A note to your note, a Xbox Play Anywhere title and a title that supports cross play are not the same thing. A title can be Anywhere, but not support cross play and vice versa.

I just don’t want some people getting the idea that all Xbox Play Anywhere titles have cross play.