Intriguing, for sure. but I'm not so sure about satisfying. There are so many dangling plotlines, I have no idea how they'll even start resolving them in the 5 hours or so that they have left.
Intriguing, for sure. but I'm not so sure about satisfying. There are so many dangling plotlines, I have no idea how they'll even start resolving them in the 5 hours or so that they have left.
Yeah, I'm not sure how this is going to wrap up in the next 5 episodes or so.
But I mean, look, at this point, I'm thinking that Dougie-Coop isn't "waking up" at all. I seem to recall Hawk saying in the original series that each spirit has to pass through the black lodge on its path to perfection. Perhaps…
Well, I guess he was cool, biker with a heart of gold, etc etc. Though, I thought he was kind of an idiot.
Reckon Ed's convenience store is where Bob and Mike, et al hung out?
Whoa.
I mean whoo ha!
On one hand, Eddie Murphy raw was homophobic as shit, but it's still a classic.
On the other hand, Pat was transphobic as shit, and it's still not funny.
She wasn't even as intellectual as Jeff Lord, the most intellectually dishonest person I've ever heard speak. She was like a poor man's Jeff Lord. With a boob job.
I'm always amused by people who feel the need to weigh in on minor conflicts that were amicably resolved days prior. Welcome to the party. It's been over for awhile now.
Ah! Thanks for the clarification. I see now that you were talking about political parties in the last part of your post, and not drawing lines based on ethnicity. My reading of "one side" and "the other side" in your OP wasn't what you intended, as your edit succinctly clarifies. I had originally read your post to…
A disproportionate number of those shows have either "America" or "Big" in it.
Ahh, Canadians, envious are they?
I've already seen the rest of Broadchurch on BBC, and let me tell you, you won't believe who is responsible for the crime! It's . ..
************SPOILER ALERT*****************
a callous, male-dominated society.
bummer, am I right?
cool. I'll check back later. I'm actually quite happy that I seem to have misinterpreted your OP.
sigh. well, perhaps I misread your OP — there were a lot of pronouns in there — but you said:
funny how I fell for trolling in an article about… yeah. trolling.
so it goes.
this is quite the rabbit hole we went down, when this sidebar was catalyzed by Zombie Carl quibbling with the use of the word "liberal" to describe Obama, et al. Clearly, the OP meant "liberal" as that term is used in U.S. domestic politics (including social policy) and NOT as that term is used in international…
shit, I can't believe I actually spent time responding to this idiot. won't make that mistake again.
blended economy? The U.S. economy is principally based on private ownership and free market principles. We don't have much in the way of state-owned enterprise, particularly in comparison to Western European states.
But you're setting up a straw man. There's no place on this earth that is perfectly "neoliberal." …
I'm always amused by folks who cite stories like "I was told once in a college class that my perspective wasn't relevant because I'm white," and then goes anti-PC because they were butt-hurt, while people of color are told essentially the same damn thing over their entire lives, and are expected put up with it.
Yeah. Zombie Carl pulled the "investopedia.com" definition, which is what the word means in international economics terms. Decode the jargon, and you're basically left with neoliberal = free market capitalist.
funny that the investopedia definition also notes that the term "neoliberal" is "rarely heard in the…
Well, the 4chan trolls and alt-right may be some subset of Trump voters, but I don't think they're representative of his base.
Not many of the trolls and alt-right faction Sean is talking about in this article seem to be much moved by religion, and as a tech generation, they are certainly moved by science, even if…