You have better reaction times driving stoned or drunk than when you're texting, yet that's legal in some states. What would you say to that?

I'm not calling it FFX HD, that's quite simply what it's called. You're the one fighting this naming convention.

If your industry standard of HD is 720 lines, what's between 480 and 720? MD? No. Anything above 481 is HD. The industry standard you're referring to does not exist in the way that you describe it.

"When talking about images, "definition" is the measurement of detail (pixels). If you haven't increased either of those for the output image, it doesn't matter what the screen size is."

You're only talking about the technical specification of HD. You don't even care if it looks good or not, you just don't want to call it HD because it doesn't output a resolution of 1920x1080.

The iPhone 4 screen is 640x960 pixels. It's also a retina display.

But this would process your blood like your body does, not just hide it's effects whilst still being as dangerous.

Just so you know, I knew nothing of this until you reported on it. You can say what you want about Youtube's ways of making money, you just did the same thing for Gizmodo.

Of course that's how they're going to do it. That's how it's been done all these past years. My point is it's ridiculous to think they're going to sell it at $350-$400 tops because it's unfeasible. They can't risk selling it at such a loss, especially with Sony's less than desirable financial position right now.

Wait until you see the specs on the PS4, then you can start laughing at yourself in the mirror for being so retarded that Sony would be losing $300+ on every console they sell. They're going to sell it at a loss, but if they want a machine that lasts for at least the 6 years that the PS3 has been going on (13 years…

I love how in your mind the fault is all GoDaddy's, not Anonymous in the slightest.

The purpose of this video is to be as authentic as possible. If you want pretty artificial picture go watch the CGI landing.

Producing music on my MBP, I have a wired keyboard, mouse, MIDI keyboard and sound sticking out of there.

I remember doing that with Limewire once.

Yes I'm serious. Do you think someone without feet winning a running medal makes sense? Maybe in 4 years at the next Olympics, prosthetics will have evolved enough that they give him a massive advantage. Where do you draw the line?

Performance-wise, I don't think you can really compare the prosthetics to some futuristic swimwear. Like you said, the prosthetics can be improved individually and eventually surpass the functions of the human body but all the swimwear did is enhance Phelps' performance (like all the swimwear does anyway).

Wow, thanks for being such a stereotypical asshole so people know the difference.

I don't understand how he was allowed to compete. Not in the asshole "But he's handicapped!" kind of way, more like how do they factor in that having prosthetics isn't an unfair advantage? It doesn't hold that much importance because he didn't win a medal but if he had I'm sure a lot of people would be in uproar about…

Thanks for this entirely useless constructive criticism. If it's so wrong and you're so smart, why not enlighten us with your know(bullshit)ledge?

When did I imply they had anything to do with each other? My argument was that saying the number of particles in the Universe is finite doesn't mean the Universe is finite as well. There could be an infinite distance between some of these particles so declaring that a finite number of particles = finite Universe is…