1) if he didn’t do it, why would he be putting himself forward? Whoever did it needs to admit it beforehand. If CK starts trying to clean it up, you and I both know it makes him look guilty whether or not he did it. Until responsibility is taken honestly, him throwing himself into it into a bad move, and we don’t know…

The abortion/shitting bit lasts from 1:40-5:50. How’s that hyperbole treating you?

It’s very, VERY hard to believe Louis did this, and they haven’t worked together since before she wrote (or shared publicly) this bit.

You are very incorrect. Loved his new shit.

Given his track record, Iam sorry, but this reeks of coincidence. Louis has always been professional and I highly doubt he’s stupid enough to get away with this level of plagiarism. Who wrote the sketch? Did Louis see Tig’s sketch? There’s clearly plagiarism here, no doubt, but the question is who did it? Who made the…

You are incorrect. The truth is, being comments does not abdicate the need for correct form, and the first sentence is a fragment and not up to snuff. I would ask you to point out where comments are precluded from being considered sentences, but we both know no grammatical rule exists to codify that principle. …

Misspelled Strom Thurmond (including spelling Thurmond two different ways in the post), lots of grammar and spelling mistakes, and mentioned the Army even though Charlie Murphy was in the Navy (clearly stated in the article). Nicely done.

More like tongue in lips. Heyooooo.

End it now. It’s the only way. Sell. Everything. Move to Jakarta. Invest in rat races. Not the rat race, but literal races involving rats.

“them society” gave my southern heart a giggle.

Hair is part of the game. Rule of the wild number 69: it’s easy to keep clean in the jungle, it’s much more difficult to keep sculpted. If you were in a place where it wasn’t possible for the latter, why would it be a problem anywhere?

are all models functional illiterates who can’t say no? Could she not read the script or talk to the director about what the hell they were shooting or why? Are models not people with free will and the discretion to hold or not hold up to their ethical imperatives?

Was she not aware of what they were shooting? She knew what the commercial was, and if she didn’t then she SHOULD feel bad for blindly doing it and pretending she was an activist. Either she knew what she was shooting and ignored how tone deaf it was or she didn’t but she wanted to pretend to be something she isn’t.…

wait, was she not aware of what they were shooting? She knew what the commercial was, and if she didn’t then she SHOULD feel bad for blindly doing it and pretending she was an activist. Either she knew what she was shooting and ignored how tone deaf it was or she didn’t but she wanted to pretend to be something she…

Shooting down oncoming missiles is not the same as attacking the United States and we both know that.

Why would someone answer such an idiotic question, especially when you’re using it as a deflection?

It’s not out of the realm of possibilities that they allowed it in retaliation for the chemical attack. They get to save face while still letting Assad get hit and without abandoning it’s Syria position. Don’t be simple AND dismissively smug. They don’t go well together.

So glad I’m not the only person whom enjoys the word “chucklefucks”. Grand, ain’t it?

I mean, technically, we all have “pubes” on our head, yours just do a poor job of covering your limp dick.

That doesn’t look like it’s in the former of a question.