peterklaven
PeterKlaven
peterklaven

she was the CEO of Squad when it was purchased by Twitter for $40 million, i’m sure she was doing ok prior to working at Twitter

This is taken out of the context. Geohotz & Elon were discussing it in quite a bit of detail at the start, then this guy comes up 20 mins later and asks the same thing.

I only discovered this a few months ago by accident, because as someone without a Twitter account I never had a reason to click “log in”, so the little X never appeared. I just assumed you had to make an account to use the site and I never wanted to use the site that badly.

I like how the main thing he wanted to fix was the annoying log-in pop-up that prevents you from scrolling too far without an account. As a non-user of Twitter, I definitely wanted to see that go away, but it serves NO purpose to remove it if you actually want people to become and remain Twitter users. It was

yes, afaik he did remove or nerf the popup that prevents you from continuing to scroll twitter when you aren’t signed in

I hope he fixed that thing he went there for. He said when he was hired that he wasn’t staying long, just to fix some personal frustrations with the app and then bouncing

Oh no! What will Giz do now to fill it’s clickbait quota now that Musk won’t comprise 10 - 20 stories a day (yes, it’s called hyperbole people)?

I’m kind of sleepy, but this says the opposite of what you meant. 

LOL, you’re still employed?  Enjoy the breadlines, dipshit.

Another shameless CIA hit piece. People are waking up to the fact that the mainstream is telling the exact opposite of the truth.  Why so afraid of Elon?  Anything that the establishment opposes, makes me a supporter.

Musk and his group have made it pretty clear that his version of “freedom or speech, not freedom of reach” is at the Tweet level, not the account level.

A bad or misleading Tweet would be de-amplified but the entire account would not be. I think this is the main difference between shadow banning and de-amplification -

We now have indisputable confirmation that a media giant suppressed the truth because it could harm the democratic party, and Giz’s main commentary is “Who cares, the files are booo-ring.” I’m astounded at the vapidity. Fucking astounded.

Our next president. Very cool!

How are you out of the grays?

She is on tape admitting to being physically abusive toward him and has been caught under oath lying about charitable donations. Anyone supporting her is utter trash.

No what he is stating is that a lack of nuance on ANY topic the woke left decides is their white savior talking point of the week, causes people that sit in the center to view the left as a whole as irrational.

The meeting is for setting up Starlink for rural school children in Brazil that have limited or no access

Quibble all you want about Musk, but you guys get that providing Starlink availability is a thing that potentially -helps- democracy, right? Like literally it means that local governments can’t fire-wall off their people. It’s a net good thing, even if you don’t like the guy providing it. Just play the chess game out

All these woke journalist on here salivating to trash Musk any chance they get. You are the people that makes a people like Musk or Rogan who have always voted Democrat turn republican with all your fake social justice. All you with the woke mind virus will just tilt the elections into the republicans hands. Bunch of d

Three days a week in the office doesn’t seem that unreasonable to me. I’ve been doing that for about 18 months at this point and I’m in a pretty good rhythm. Then again I have a 6 minute commute door to door, if that was 30 or 40 minutes I might have a different opinion about that. 

The vast majority of the content they put out is d grade or lower. You don’t see reporting about, and most people don’t notice most of what they put out. They released over 100 films in 2021, not counting feature length documentaries.