percent222
percent222
percent222

Refusing to engage them because “that’s what they want” is not exactly a sound strategy.

You got a helicopter with tiny wittle guns... How cute...

“I see you’re passing the sound barrier”

Apologies for double posting but it’s been obvious that the mood has slowly changed in these comment sections over the past several months. (this isn’t directed towards oglocc’s comment at all)If you disagree so vehemently, go write your own articles or at least please don’t personally attack the author that is at

Signed up after around 4 years reading FA just to back Tyler on this. Great article and please, please keep it going man. Thanks!

You’re just predicting the present. That’s easy.

You must be new here Tom. The moderation on this commenting area is pretty much a free for all outside of filth

“Beautiful, beautiful, perfect F-22s, it’s going to be great, really really great and perfect and Huugeee!”

Not really when you consider expeditionary warfare. Only 125 Raptors are combat coded. Of which like a third are down for MX at any given time. This could not even include deep MX, I can’t remember. Say that gives the force like 85 actually flyable full-up ready for combat Raptors at any given time. That means just a

IIRC the videos and documentation went beyond final assembly. In fact they plan on using those videos and tooling to make replacement parts for the F-22 and F119s I believe. Also, take a chill pill, we can talk here without all the know it all attitude.

Hillary Clinton would just be an extension of the Obama administration. She might say that she wants to increase defense spending to certain crowds, but that’s pandering campaign BS and not an actual plank in her platform. The Democrats barely even mention defense during their debates, and when they do it’s about how