peppermintmonster
peppermintmonster
peppermintmonster

Yes, please do. Seriously, list five people who are in prison because they sent someone a dick pic. Since it's apparently such a common phenomenon, I'm sure you'll have no trouble finding examples.

Bye bye now. You won't be missed.

When you comment on a public forum you should be prepared for people to disagree with you or take issue with what you say. There is no reason to be rude to someone who has been nothing but civil to you, or to tell them to go away. Everyone else has exactly as much right to be here as you do. If you don't care to

There is no need for hostility or personal insults. The law penalizes people who expose their fetus to drugs through their own body, not people who expose their babies to drugs after they are born. Very simple.

This law does not protect born children. It protects fetuses. It is already illegal to force a baby to take meth, as it should be.

Very good point. I believe that as the law stands now actual charges can only be filed once the baby is born, but it isn't a very difficult leap of logic to suggest that if a law like this were to become more common and natural in the public eye that an addicted woman's behavior might be criminalized as "assault"

I am pro-choice, and I do not support laws that indirectly force a mother into aborting, taking that choice away from her. I also believe that the way we criminalize addiction with solely punitive measures helps no one, not addicts, not their families, not society as a whole.

I find it interesting that you refer to a fetus in an addict's body as an "innocent human." Would you be comfortable hearing a pro-life individual saying that women shouldn't abort because it would be killing an "innocent human"?

I too support access to abortion. What I don't support is laws that limit women's options and remove choice.

I have no objection to a woman seeking an abortion for any reason. I also do not want women to be forced into seeking abortions because legislation like this makes their circumstances more dire and their options fewer.

Very true. Also a reason to go slow and use plenty of lube. As if you needed another reason.

1) Doing drugs while pregnant is a bad idea.

A couple people have brought up how smoking is central to one of his most defining storylines, but even beyond that, I would say the chain smoking has a significance beyond just a prop. It's a constant reminder of his own self-destructive impulses. Constatine is always slowly and subtly destroying himself under the

Up against nature itself, eh? In that case it must be something that exists in all human cultures, in all time periods.

Yes, it's harassment if someone tells you to stop and you keep doing it. Why is that so hard to figure out?

I got the impression that it wasn't that the tip was bad percentage wise. Like, I don't know how much that soda cost but a dollar probably is at lease 33%. It's the fact that he made a big point of it after making creepy comments at her—like she's supposed to fan herself and drop her drawers because he was generous

I promise you that phrase is just as annoying to those of us fortunate enough to have a career in a field they love. It's simply not true. I don't care how much you love your "passion," if you're working at it full time there are going to be parts of it that are dull, difficult, even miserable. Just like any job.

More

As I understand it, the whole point of the hashtag was that it WASN'T lumping all men together, and at the same time it wasn't pretending sexism as a cultural force was just the fault of "a few bad apples." That it was saying, yes NotAllMen sexually assault or harass or demean women for being women, but YesAllWomen

This reminds me of the old urban legend where if you heat a can of diet coke above a certain temperature it turns into formaldehyde. Then it was acetone. I don't know about diketopiperazine and it's relationship to aspartame but it sounds to me just like the next replacement chemical for the legend.