“Sir, this is Arby’s.”

I think you’re right except I think we still need to advocate for them. What I really want to see is more focus on the big picture - are we a country who believes all humans on its soil deserve the same rights, or are we not? If we are, it follows that they have the same rights to healthcare and college tuition as the…

Decriminalization of the border and health ins for illegals polls abysmally. While some version of medicare for all polls very well.

I honestly don’t think that decriminalizing border crossings, while at the same time supporting free college and health insurance for illegals is going to resonate with your average voter. Reid is right on this. 

I’ve charted it out

I’d also argue that the fall off wasn’t nearly what the Brosnan years were.

Got it! Yes, the value of  your 401K is meaningless right now. Keeping the cash going in is meaningful. 

Consumer spending is 80% of our GDP. So goes their confidence, so goes the economy. 

you’re my favorite hyperventilating idiot. 

So I’m bored at work......

I’d be fine with candidates criticizing Obama’s immigration policies if even one of them comes up with a coherent alternative of their own. The lack of one, and this insane far left push to de facto open borders is what will kill us next November.

When Ian Polter comes off looking more professional, you’ve got to reassess some things. 

Because Shep Smith is a Democrat. Anyways, CNN did a good job.

With apologies I bet that chafes her balls.

1st Gear: Remember that Biden is going to be on the stage.

So, there’s clearly money to be made by investing in woman’s soccer, but they aren’t bc they are women? Maybe. Just maybe. There really isn’t money to be made on women’s soccer outside of WC and Olympic years.

Why is Splinter so dead set on medicare for all or nothing? When literally every other western nation that has a form of government health care, that Splinter cites as reasons to implement medicare for all, does not actually use a system that is close to medicare for all? I mean weird hill to die on. 

I mean, I’d be fine with eliminating the debt ceiling. It would help prevent disruptions and ensure the funding of existing legislation. But to the extent you’re talking about hypotheticals as it relates to prospective legislation as a reason to want to eliminate it, then it’s sort of beside the point.

I’d like to think it comes from a place of “we want to keep our noses clean/no skeletons in the closet.” And I really can appreciate that attitude, but it’s for a perfect world. We do not live in one of those and all of us have imperfections.