Yes, but the point is that an enclosure that would be ideal for an Incandescent as it can sustain higher temps (and be shielded, with or without ventilation) may not be ideal for an CFL. And remember this is ambient temp. Even 200 degrees F is not terribly hot, and definitely not hot enough to start a fire (to get an…

For those who may be confused that the CFL vs. Incandescent seems contrary to what we've been told about CFLs and Incandescents (CFLs burn cooler while Incandescents burn hotter), what the article is talking about is that the the threshold for failure due to high ambient temp is lower for a CFL than your standard…

I believe what the article is saying is that to function most efficiently (not burn out), CFL bulbs need ambient temperature (temp around the bulb) to stay below 122F for best results. Incandescent bulbs may burn hotter, but they have a higher ambient temp threshold and are therefore not as easily affected by the…

Sprint has been saying this for months.

Reminds me of the old Nokia e70 I used to have. That phone was THE best texting phone I have ever had. Too bad the OS sucked.

Great, now there's no way they'll let me take the hanger home with me. How am I going to hang up clothes in my closet without free hangers?!

I was under the impression that the radiation was caused from the phone being active (talking on the phone, sending or receiving a text, push email). In that case, being in one's pocket, unless you are streaming data constantly, would cause little to no radiation.

rabble rabble!

To be fair, their infographic with exception of the #2 image is looking it INCOME as opposed to the too-big-to-fail corporations versus the common man. Sure, in a big Ven diagram of it all, there is overlap between the most wealthy and the too-big-to-fail corporations, but there are many wealthy entrprenurs that are…

...doesn't it make perfect sense to everyone else that those who have more money will be able to reinvest it and therefore have more financial growth than hose who don't?

Originally I thought it was the high guy from Grandma's Boy.

Scientists who modify existing theories based on newly available information instead of dogmatically professing the same thing despite contrary evidence?

What is the context of the original image? I see this picture all the time.

Well what I meant was that statistically if it fails when you press it, unless it is some massive system-wide failure, releasing the brakes and pressing them again would have the desired effect.

He needs to set it to the "B-movie Kung-fu" setting. I'm even willing to bet if he said "Wha weddah forCAST today?" Siri would have gotten it. If someone asked my that question, I'd tell them the weather today has the same purpose as the weather has everyday. The problem is not only accent but also being grammatically…

Well, at a glance it looks similar...but that's where the similarities end. I posted a pic of the Touchpad. White box, picture of tablet (however at an angle), text describing the product. At first glance it really does look similar, but I am in total agreement with you that when you actually scrutinize the…

I know the reasoning, even in tablets, but the average phone user plugs their phone in each night or at least every other night.

Talk about a late reply!

If they fail three times out of a trillion, just squeeze the brakes one more time, duh.

FYI they have the same icon's because that is the icon created by the software developer. Every phone maker doesn't have to make their own Opera Web Browser icons, and software developers wouldn't want this because it lowers brand recognition.