He bought a bunch of call options on GameStop right before going back on social media, so I think it’s pretty clear he was hoping his presence alone would jack up the stock price and make him a lot of money. I bet the SEC could get him on market manipulation over that.

Everyone has the right to bear worms. 

Took a page from Kinja.

They defeated Apocalypse but he’s immortal so he’s hard to kill. He did have Asteroid M in the old show, but he sunk it beneath the water when it didn’t work out. There’s a scene where we see him raising it out of the water here. The Phoenix force can’t be destroyed but it did leave Jean’s body. I’m not sure what…

I’m not convinced. I highly recommend reading the study on JAMA. Takeaways:

Constellation reminded me of Dark, a slow-burn, time-jumping effort that had to lean very, very hard on its cast to hold interest. The viewer has to spend a lot of energy figuring out “where” and “when” they were looking at. This can work when there is a big payoff. But the season finale felt more like a mid-season…

(Pictured: Donald Trump, describing his own penis in a rare moment of honesty.)

A tech blog arguing for the suppression of technology in order to maintain the status quo 😂

Good attempt. What if instead of taking a king high straight flush on my first turn I take four kings? Then you can’t get an ace high straight flush and I’m threatening to get a king high straight flush on my second turn.

I just noticed that Musk didn’t say August 8, he said 8/8. Just in case anyone had any doubts that he’s a white supremacist.

> Goes to show they are pretty great at adapting books, luckily the TBP book series is already finished, so they won’t have the GoT ending problem.

Why is Giz against this?

I agree but Whataboutism is bullshit. Both should be called out.

I hate agreeing with Elon but he has a point. It is straight up bullshit Microsoft gets away with this stuff.

Personally, I love nuts, but they do not belong in brownies imo. 

Yeah I'm still not sure how legitimate that guys story is.  

I think alterations to the original material is a “dammed if you do dammed if you don’t” situation. Thinking from that perspective, it seems logical to not allocate resources to change these. Also, we don’t see Hollywood making any of these types of changes to their re-releases. Not sure if this deep a criticism is…

what is up with this trend of just recycling an article from another site on this network? i see that technically, the title and subtitle are changed...i guess that’s enough to be “different”

Seems to be a whole lot of taking the claims at face value and repeating them. Is this some kind of weird advertorial content?

There was an article saying you should get both shots in your dominant arm since you’ll use it more and it will reduce the soreness.