Yeah, I don’t buy any of this. Why would all the countries cooperate, why haven’t there been leaps in tech based on Alien ships? Why would they even come here? Why would they even send anything biological, if anything it would be a drone/ai bot. Why have all the UFOs for the last 70 years looked nothing like what ever…

Elon is lucky Apple isn’t as petty and small as he is. You know an Elon-owned Apple would just ban developers who would cause them trouble.  “No iPhone version of the Tesla app” would probably hurt car sales a bit.

Thank you for the clarification.  That’s was I get for trying to ‘well actually...’ a Doctor!

Generally legal fees aren’t really a thing for governments (or large corporations) when you get to be a certain size it makes sense to have a bunch of lawyers working for you all the time.

Bagel post? Time to post my two home bagel tricks:

The problem with Instant Pot is similar to that of Peloton. A thing that was very popular and pretty well made.

1) You’ve seen Minority Report right? If you tell someone a computer is gestured controlled most of the time people will picture that, hands waving around in front of your like a deranged conductor, that would be tiring.  Not having to do that is good information.

So, taking products for free is what you’re advocating? That is the best deal right?

Well people are very upset that Nintendo would do anything to protect their rights. “OMG I can’t get this one emulator on Steam!”. Saying, “we aren’t saying they shouldn’t be able to do it, but we will get very upset at them if they do do it”. Is being needlessly pedantic.

So you ignore all my points and run away? I guess, I did make many good arguments.

Yeah. I’m just pointing out that regardless of the reason, shouldn’t they have the right to “bury” it if they want?

You’re aware threading on these sites is ass right? Replying to be 4 different times without quotes is confusing. I don’t know what replies are related to what. I’ll try to respond to it all, but if I miss some, feel free to follow up.

So IP rights should be based on the quality of the work? 

My main point was: shouldn’t artists/owners have the ability to control how their work is distributed (even if that is ‘none of the above’)?

Well at least you’re being (partly) honest. But I bet if we looked at your purchase history / emulation history we’d find not as many purchases as you’re leading people to believe.

Which is mostly done at the request of the copyright holder. Why do you think that helps you case?

If you tried to post TSotS on YouTube/Facebook you don’t think Disney would care? They would just leave it up? Or would they use whatever legal resource they have to have Google/Meta take it down?

They were accusing Nintendo of burying their work, my point was just, so what? Shouldn’t a company/artist be allowed to choose how a work is distributed?

Shouldn’t the artist or creator have the ability to control that? Should Disney be forced to put “Song of the South” on Disney+?

Did you miss the rest of the article or the title?