What he said, so, no. Plus, the very existence of this condition would inevitably sour the relationship, so, no. Can you imagine when/if the relationship does go South and you’re like, “Motherfucker, I’ve been fucking a goddamned goat for you!”
More so that it’s not even a consideration necessary based on the base assumption. I wouldn’t ponder that choice beyond “yack! No!” because I don't believe in one soulmate.
This was my thought. I have no interest in knowing a goat that well, so I’d give up the first “soul mate” for the next one who is inevitably going to come into my life because, yes, my life is that awesome.
tl;dr: no, I wouldn’t fuck the goat, another lady (or fella) will be along soon
WRONG! I have a soulmate and no one can tell me any different.
You’re getting some sass here but you made a fair point.
I’m single and although it would be nice to have someone, I’ve found enough contentment in my life not to become a goat-fucker.
I too will take the second best match for me amongst the at least 2 billion people in the world of the sexual orientation that I favor and I will use the goat to make chevre.
Answer the question, Jim.
you are fun at parties
You find your soulmate. You’re a perfect match in every possible way, and it is an absolute, immutable fact that…
The final tableau of To Kill A Mockingbird has always given me a sour feeling toward the book—it ends with the black…