Yeah, whitey's got it coming.

Gee, I'm shocked that a group of people with an agenda would change the definition of an existing word so that it fits their worldview and the narrative they want to push. That, like, never happens! Ever!

That was amazing!

Unless you buy into the ridiculous narrative that people should be categorized by their complexion, then judged in a generalized manner based on the agenda-driven perception of people who share respective skin tones. Saksih has no desire to treat people as individuals. Saksih is a bigot, a collectivist, and an ass.

What about white Jewish people? Can a person of color be racist against a jewish person?

Of course she's going to disagree with this.

"Seriously, you're basically telling us that we can't make jokes about rapists because we're against jokes about rape victims. Don't other the poor rapists! Don't generalize the pedophiles! BITCH, THEY'RE ALL GUILTY. We are guilty. Get over it."

Of course you disagree. You have to. Your cognitive dissonance forces it.

Maybe it is the same as psychology, but it certainly isn't the same as biology. Not even close.

How do you "suck" at sociology? What does that even mean? You can suck at math. You can suck at physics. You can suck at engineering or coding. But how do you suck at sociology? Fail to regurgitate whatever pseudoscience or politicized set of "facts" that your professor pushed?

Jokes are fine. Jokes and humor do not require racism, hatred, or prejudice. The very real belief among gawker progressives that white people are inherently bad and should be collectivised and othered is stupid and hypocritical. In order to avoid facing their own cognitive dissonance, they redefine words and…

No, I agree. Only white people can be racist. That's a totally reasonable standpoint. No one else ever oppresses anyone, and therefore no one else is racist. And no one oppresses white people, so you can't be racist at white people. It is a totally sensible standpoint, given the dictionary definition of "racism":

You're really just a caricature at this point.

"Ugh, you moron. Take sociology classes," is a really ironic statement, btw. Sociology is the kind of thing that people who can't handle hard sciences pursue.

Ugh, yeah, you're right. Everyone who disagrees with your extremely liberal/progressive belief is stupid and wrong. You're among the elite vanguard of intellectuals. The rest of us are mere peons and simpletons. Please enlighten us! I beg of you, please enlighten us! We've never heard your views before! No one…

Who the fuck takes a 4 month old to a concert?

Yes, I do think that only a small subset of people owned slaves, and an even smaller percentage of them are freaking alive today. Same with those who fought against the civil rights movement.

And I'm a fan of all jokes. Period. Punching up is fine, punching down is fine. Joking at the expense of the the power structure is fine. Joking at the expense of victims is fine. It's all fine. The difference between us, is that I'm principled and consistent. You're so wrapped up in your agenda and pushing a…

You, always with these sociology classes. It's boring at this point.

Really? You don't think that wars over resources are EXACTLY THE FREAKING SAME as colonization? Colonization and the mercantilist economics that supported it, were rooted in the acquisition of resources.