My comparisons weren't facetious. Sarcastic, satiric, but not facetious. (Words have meanings, and that word's meaning doesn't apply here Nothing inappropriate or flippant about my use of humor, and my purpose was to mock her using humor.) It was sarcasm. Satire. Mocking of Kayla's ridiculousness.

Nobody is in "redface" at any point in this show. Not even close, unless you're counting Ellie's attempts at makeup. There might be an issue with Krakowski's role, but there is no redface.

Sadly, so do most people. I find it endlessly amusing to hear people mispronouncing a fancy word for being knowledgeable and well-spoken, all without any irony or awareness on their part.

Aww, that's cute. Where'd you get that, from some bullshit fortune cookie?

Johnny Depp playing Tonto in that crappy movie = white washing

"Gimmick" account! Thank you. I couldn't remember what to call it, so I was stuck on "major fucking asshole" account. :) Seriously, I don't usually feed the trolls, but sometimes I like to smack a douchebag upside the face.

Nobody's taking "extensive pride" about anything, so stuff your pompous insults up your idiot ass. Sorry, but you just post too much overly aggressive bullshit here to be nice to you.

The discussion is important. Kayla's take on it is laughable.

"Imagine the courtroom scenes without cutting to Fey and Mimer all the time."

Kayla is right! How dare they cast a non-Lakota actor in that role!? That's outrageous.

If you're a human who speaks English and has a vocabulary beyond, oh, the fifth grade, "reckon" is completely acceptable.

No matter how many times you repeat it, you're still wrong, especially about people knowing you Kate Bush was in the early 1980s. Sorry, but no, most Americans had NO idea who she was at the time.

Reality isn't required for a show to jump a shark. A show just has to come unhinged from its own rules, and from its own quality.

I stand corrected. You have company in your stupidity. (How ANYBODY could make a connection between a 1987 film and 1991 death like this is beyond me, and I deal with all kinds of stupidity for a living.) Oh well…sorry to insult you. I amend my insult to include all the people who added this idiotic wrinkle to a…

I guess I just had a smarter circle of friends, coworkers, family members, acquaintances, and strangers, because despite some fascination with the "boy in the window" bit, none of us ever talked about something as obviously, painfully stupid as the Clapton's-kid connection.

That's genius, posting a definition. So what? That doesn't change the fact that there's never been such a legend connecting Clapton's kid to this movie. Anybody who sat around with friends making up something like that is stupid. So, thanks for posting a definition—glad you can cut and paste—but that doesn't affect…

Well, you went full stupid, because no, there's no such legend, and that's a stupid thing to try to spread. Clapton's son died in 1991; this movie came out in 1987. No connection between them at all, except in your dumb comment.

I posted my other comment before seeing this one, claiming you're from New Mexico. Things must've changed completely in the last couple of decades if Native Americans there are preferring "indigenous" to their own tribal identities. Acoma, Laguna, Navajo—all prefer their actual tribe name to any outside label, but I'd…

I've never met a Native American who preferred "indigenous." (And I was born & raised in New Mexico, around more Native Americans daily than most Americans will meet in a lifetime.)

(cue theme music)
Unwatchable - they're all bad, damn it
It's a tragedy
Unwatchable - they're all bad, damn it