*10 million Super Bowls

These are not the 'sodes you're looking for. Move along. Move along.

I'll be honest. I didn't notice until I read this review. There are just too many jokes and gags in this show to catch 'em all! (but I should have noticed SOMETHING going on with Gina)

Uh, yeah, sure, that's EXACTLY what is happening here. We're ready to burn her (not), and I've been defending male comedians (not)…

I don't care if they hate a song I like. What bothers me is the inane explanations, the sneering superiority, the empty-headed comments that ignore facts to hold up some personal point they want to make…

That would be hilarious!

Wow, this was a truly horrid installment of Hatesong. It made me flip 180 in my thinking about Esposito (after this interview, I thoroughly dislike her), re-evaluate Mellencamp's song as a classic, and stop reading crap from Marah Eakin.

Oh, I agree, she's always seemed genuine and nice, but she's never come across as charming to me before. She usually seems a bit uncomfortable because that's part of her persona—a bit disjointed from the rest of us goobers—but here, she seems very comfortable and totally relaxed without being stoned or useless.…

After watching Silverman's monologue, I found myself using a word that I NEVER expected to apply to her: charming. She was surprisingly mellow while staying up-tempo, she pushed the lap bit just far enough and then ended it nicely (insisting that the woman keep the mic), and her Q&A with her younger selves was…

That is because the reviews were written by different people with different opinions.

Don't bother. Trying to engage with Jordan Orlando is like slamming your face into a brick wall, except the brick wall is more likely to say something worthwhile. JO has a history here of just attacking whatever director is being mentioned. You should see his endless rants about Clint Eastwood.

Yes, really. It's a song about a skanky woman, and that line is about them doing cocaine and then having sex. Mick was having fun with the phrasing and expecting listeners to be smart enough to follow him.

What's the problem? It's a song about doing drugs—pot, opium, hashish, etc.—while traveling around the world. You know, like a rock band such as RUSH did regularly?

Wow, you are a total a-hole. Not a worthwhile word in your entire spit-flecked, red-cheeked, shrill-voiced diatribe.

"But it’s hard to invest in a conflict with a predetermined resolution;
there’s just no suspense in a franchise whose history is already
written."

He's already been doing that with his editorial guidance.

Well, if readers didn't have to wade through literally thousands of words of pointless, padded prose to get to anything substantive in A.V. Club articles, maybe the writers wouldn't be such easy targets for our disdain.

It's good to meet a fellow non-fan of Todd's, um, style! (which you deconstructed quite well)

Wow, you're a true waste of space. I tried to engage in conversation, jackass. THERE—finally, some invective from me so that you're not a liar about THAT point too.

Or maybe YOU should try better to express rational arguments? Old man? Lumbago? Sorry to hear it. I was diagnosed with gout 6 years ago, so I know how it feels to age. But I still think you're either (a) wanting to make a point that isn't showing in your comments or (b) making a comparison that makes no sense to make.