pauljones
pauljones
pauljones

You, Spiegelus.Q.Hernandez, Esq. are quite right. Fuck the trolls and the wannabe Kimis. You, sir, are Jalop for knowing that there is an appropriate time and place for everything, and that public roads aren't an appropriate place for time attack runs.

The idea may be sound, but it isn't really applicable in this context as it doesn't address the key issue. A solid high-speed would address the issue of reducing the number of people driving on long-distance trips (though how effectively it would do so is up for debate), but that's not what's causing the growth in

I like the idea of the linen inserts, though. It's a great deal more interesting, both in a visual and tactile context, than just leather or plastic.

You know what, I'm just going to come right out and say this: I like this thing, and I'd totally rock the hell out of it. I like the idea of using a wider variety of materials in cars, especially interiors. In fact, I wish automakers would do things like this as a standard offering, rather than as "special editions."

Don't throw the chair out the window. It's frustrating to get shit on so much, but not everyone has kicked you while you're down. Lincoln may have a tough road, but I think there's a lot of potential for it, and sticking with it would be a great opportunity to contribute to taking a classic all-American brand, tearing

Different views, I suppose. The FR-S/BRZ look like snakes that bit into a heavily salted lime. On the other hand, I sure as shit wouldn't complain about an opportunity to sit across from Taylor Swift and have lunch with her.

Oh, it is on. Also, mine's bigger.

At least Taylor Swift is cute.

Yes, Captain Kirk was one of the best. On the other hand, Picard was the best.

I understand where you're coming from. But, like you, there's something that makes me cringe - every single time I hear things like "It's a more compliant, high-tech car to drive on a daily basis."

I love you too, Spiegel.

I actually always loved the E92 M3 vs the S197 Mustang comparison, primarily because the results wound up being exactly the opposite than what we're seeing with the Viper vs Corvette test here. The Viper vs Corvette certainly shows what an extra $30k will get you, and that's quite a bit if being a track animal is your

And here we go:

I'm well aware that you read all of the other comments. What did I say elsewhere that I didn't say directly in response to you?

I agree that that is indeed the general truth. But the message of truth, so to speak, isn't the issue that I have with the article. In this instance, it's simply the way in which the message was communicated.

That was a fantastic way of communicating your point clearly, reasonably concisely, and without unnecessary undertones.

I understand, and agree with, your general viewpoint with regards to the Corolla.

The entire tone of the article is astoundingly pretentious, but here are some very specific examples:

It's not the fact that you personally don't like it. It's the fact that every time you and so many others on Jalopnik talk about the fact that you don't like it, you come off as arrogant and judgmental towards people that do like it for what it is, and sometimes towards people who simply have a different perspective