Decieving somebody in order to convince them to have sex with you is considered “sexual assault” in studies that make up the 1 in 5 college women have been raped stats.
pauladeanchayefsky
pauladeanchayefsky
other than the interview of the club owner, what other examples of the coverage did you find as biased against the accuser?
Prosecuted with what evidence?
As mentioned above, you are completely wrong about this and it was the accuser’s mother who made up the story about the rape kit and their own lawyer - a family friend - who revealed her name.
You were spouting too many facts and not enough revisionism.
Fleetwood Mac?
1. Holtzclaw is half-white, half Asian. Also, his alleged victims include several Hispanic women.
I didn’t expect anything more from somebody who blows things out of proportion to fit a Rape Culture fantasy fetish narrative. I’m sure you’re a very good person, but just a little misunderstood. Have a nice day.
The two cases in Buffalo consists of one documented and proven incident and another unproven accusation based on flimsy evidence that will not be pursued in court.
No, bro. It’s actually a felony to pay somebody off not to testify in a criminal investigation.
From link you posted:
Anybody who is accused of a crime and hasn’t been convicted in a court of law is supposed to be referred to as the “alleged”____. That is standard and decent journalism practice that not only protects the ideal that one is innocent until proven guilty, but also protects the publication from potential slander or libel…
lol. smh.
What if he’s innocent and thousands of people are falsely accusing an innocent man to his face on national TV?
Don’t blame Buffalo. And Kane doesn’t have a “history of getting off basically scot-free.” There was one single incident in Buffalo with the cab driver several years ago and the cabbie himself said it was blown out of proportion. Maybe he was paid to say that, but one incident is not enough to qualify as “a history.”
This was the comment of yours I originally replied to:
1. This is mostly a philosophical thing, but calling an anonymous person (her name got out to some people, but not most) a golddigger or a bitch might be insulting to the person getting called them, but they’re not ruining her reputation. On the other hand, calling a specific person a rapist is a criminal accusation…
Getting one’s face mass ejaculated on is a sad reason to stop lap lapping.
“bitch” and “gold digger” is not as bad as “rapist.” And Kane has been called a rapist by many people, despite no evidence supporting it. As for your feeling about Kane buying the woman’s silence, that is beyond speculation since it g0es against what little facts have been revealed about the case, which includes that…