So she didn’t just shoot him despite the fact that his hands were up. She shot him BECAUSE he put up his hands?

Yes. How “strange” that a black man, when confronted by a cop, would put his hands in the air. It couldn’t possibly be that he wanted to preemptively signal that he was unarmed, given that so many other black person-cop interactions turn deadly without provocation.

What is the sound of one hand making jerk off motions?

Given that he was a prince, as in, the ruler of a kingdom, I’m pretty sure he knew politics.

I mean, the Dalai Lama has sort of been involved in politics for a very long time.

Didn’t work with the Pope, not gonna work with the Dalai Lama

Why didn’t the fact the authorities say that in fact he is not under investigation for anything make you change your headline to, “Brad Pitt Not Under Investigation for Child Abuse”? Journalistic ethics much?

Given the update story says the LAPD denied the investigation, I’m wondering if Angie’s legal team is floating these rumors out to TMZ in advance of her custody case. Even if they turn out to be false, it still links his name with “child abuse” and poisons the public against him. It seems she hired many of the same…

There are a lot of people jumping to some serious conclusions in this thread. I look forward to the drip drip of more information to see just how unhinged these comments look in hindsight.

How does Angelina “masterminding” the media make her narrative the true one?

That could have saved me so much time.

The fact that you are so sure about this makes you sound crazy, or like you want to justify behaviours you yourself want allowed.
Just so you know.

i hope you’re not implying she has daddy issues.

Repeated pummeling is not an even approaching reasonable force for retaliating against someone throwing pie in the face of a public official.

Now, getting to the cops to administer a beating would be a whole ‘nother matter, if not downright American.

Rage stroke. RAGE. STROKE. Women contain multitudes. We are not a monolith. We are individual people with individual needs and preferences. What does this one want? Not the same shit as the lady in the cubical next to me, that’s what. Just like everyone else.

The trolls are out in force. Please flag and dismiss.

Ahhh ok. So it’s less Microsoft’s Spotify and more Microsoft’s iTunes.

This will only add $500 (- $900) to the cost of every car put out.

Low income new car buyers? LOL.

How long will this take to be ubiquitous? Oh, 25 years or so.


Feelgood law. That’s all it is.

My car is an idiot and will scream at you instantly for taking off a seatbelt. I’ve been at a dead stop and had passengers re-buckle themselves to finish a conversation before getting out just to shut the thing up. There is no ignoring it.

Naïveté showing here, but: how did humanity get to the point where legislation has to be made for this issue?