So here’s my understanding of this bizarre article - once again Gizmodo in the tank for Clinton (or at least so anti-Trump that the science part of this publication has flown out the window).

SourceFed’s findings were as close to a “double blind” type study as one could produce, thoroughly explaining in vivid detail…

Perhaps you are the one who should re-think the notion of “logic”, as you have confused criticizing someone for their opinions and using an organized mob to re-enforce what opinions are acceptable.

Then people are not “free” to have their own perspectives and opinions. Instead they are punished for having views that are outside of the mainstream. There is a fundamental difference in criticizing a position that someone holds and demanding that they be punished for that view. From the perspective of a free…

If you’re not with her then you’re a racist misogynist.

So you’re telling me that a guy is using his own money to do something that he wants to do? This is a shocking and unprecedented turn of events.

These are pulse-jets, not turbines.

How do you get the title wrong for a song whose title is literally the first lyric?

But she said months ago that she provided "all the e-mails"? How is this possible?

Um… Isn’t the scary bit that (allegedly) there are emails that show Clinton Foundation donors got access and special treatment from her and her aides during her time as SoS? Depending on what that special treatment was… That could be a pretty fucking big deal.

How is promoting “gun and safety classes” cause for alarm? Hollywood mythologizes guns to the point where many onscreen depictions are inaccurate. If someone picks up a gun, thinking it works the way it does in movies, someone is going to get hurt. It might be them, it might be someone else, but someone will be…

Oh my stars and garters! How dare those guys try and sell their replica guns and promote gun safety! Those monsters! Those knaves!

This article is pretty misleading. Were they selling replicas of actual, real life firearms? Or were they selling replicas of easily noticeable comic/video game fire arms? If they were selling replica Sig Sauers and AR-15s, then yea, that’s not cool. But if I could buy an M-8 Avenger or a Carnifex Hand Cannon, then…

I go to WW Chicago every year. The claim they don’t allow real weapons is bullshit. There are no fewer than 4 booths set up right now that sell real knives and swords and throwing stars. Every year the number of “weapons” vendors goes up.

“According to the Tribune, the booth was also promoting gun and safety classes, and DS Arms owner Dave Selvaggio himself said it was also about giving attendees information about real guns.”

It was clearly an intentional crash (even in their wording, they aimed it and flew it at top speed towards the backstop and just watched it zoom straight into the fence). DJI getting irritated and insisting that the unit be returned, and getting more strident about it when months go by with no return.. That’s all very…

The real question is - when you flew the DJI phantom for the review you were writing for pay on this commercial web site - who was the licensed pilot and who was the spotter as required in the FAA part 33 exemption you must have filed in order to do it legally?

I don’t blame them. After reading your article, I clearly believed you did this on purpose. At best, you were testing a feature you knew would fail.

You fucking idiot. You are seriously going to try and say it was an accident when the video, that you linked to in the article, is titled:

Well I sure as hell know I don’t believe you.

If Trump said, “prisoners at Gitmo are treated like dogs and it’s unacceptable,” Gawker’s hack staff would headline: “Trump Compares Detainees to Dogs,” and then put it on Gizmodo, because it’s so tech related.