pasports3111111
pasports31
pasports3111111

yes, because trying to make sure every person in the country can see a doctor, get their prescriptions filled, and not go bankrupt is sociopathy.

A “return to normalcy” does not win elections.

Centrist ability to get party loyalist to fall inline does not translate the general election presidential wins.

ok but that’s the most scripted looking dive I’ve seen outside of Spanish Futbol.

I find it more amusing when the people think they have something worth millions and go on and on about how their ancestor brought it over on the Mayflower and it turns out to be worthless junk someone bought at Sears.

Don’t forget literally giving Hillary debate questions beforehand and plotting to use Bernie’s Judaism to attack him with.

You want to talk about coronations? You project. Because we all know damn well that the way was paved for Hillary Clinton by the DNC with their shitty debate schedule set up to capitalize on her better name renegotiation, their insider bullshit and the fact that people were basically not encouraged to run because it

If Joe is the nominee it would prove that the Democratic party doesn’t learn nor listen. It’ll be 2016 all over again with a candidate who is basically telling people who are hurting that there’s not a damn thing they can or will even attempt to do to help which isn’t going to get the base out.

You make excellent points. There are no perfect candidates, but I’ll take Bernie’s consistency on issues from LGBTQ+ rights (he didn’t wait until 2012 to be in favor of gay marriage) to his support of women’s reproductive rights (before Roe v. Wade btw) to his passionate speech against the 1994 Crime bill (which he

Please make note of my comment directed towards Rooo above.

‘Dirtbag leftists,' oh thanks, almost thought you were making a good faith critique. Thanks for signalling otherwise!!!!!!

Which would be hilarious considering everything Trump has done. I don’t really give a shit what the GOP says about any of the candidates. Why would I?

genuinely unsure how anyone with any reading  comprehension could come to this conclusion

The damage from such a stupid error has to be far greater than the benefit of half-assedly trying to justify Trump’s stupidity.

Funny, they told me the opposite if i stopped holding my Marvel Comics in public i might get a girlfriend.

... to detect drastic heart/pulse rate increases in someone who is already being monitored as someone with the potential to commit some violent act.

Spiking heart rates are not an indicator of mass murder, and is just as ridiculous as tracking walking distance.

“but the idea of the government taking away your ability to defend yourself against them (guns) isn’t scary?”

Why would Brazil accept $20M from condescending Europeans to fight a forest fire, when all they need are a few rakes????

Instead of saying “America ‘deserved’ 9/11" he would have been better off saying “Decades of American imperialism and meddling in the foreign affairs of sovereign nations while funding, arming and training all sides in unending wars that only furthered our own agenda created a generation of extremists which lead to