pasports3111111
pasports31
pasports3111111

Shit’s sad, man. Fultz is a nice kid and clearly worked hard this summer based off what reports, but man...wtf

I thing I would note about Simmons is that, while he obviously needs to learn to shoot at even a subpar level if he ever wants to be a truly elite player, I do think how he’s performed isn’t reflective of his true talent level. He tweaked his back like 3 games into the year and really hasn’t looked the same since,

When Fultz plays without Simmons and gets minutes at point guard he actually looks pretty decent and as if he could be a promising young player. But right now, despite his jumper being better than last year, it’s very inconsistent and at times he’s reluctant to shoot it. Him and Simmons on the floor together is

I don’t know what the solution is to this. It’s a real problem. There are these 24/7 news networks out there and they sell out for higher ratings, meaning they avoid asking tough questions so people will be willing to come back on their show, they sensationalize stories, they focus incessantly on things that aren’t

The part that’s arguably most terrifying is whenever this happens there is a non-insubstantial portion of the right that blames the left for it.

We’ll see what happens I guess, my hopes are not high overall for the game. Incredibly disappointed, leading up to E3 I had some hopes that maybe we’d see Starfield coming out. Then the FO76 teaser dropped, I was a bit let down but still excited to play a new FO. Then the reports of the type of game it was...ugh. Just

He actually played really well in the 2nd half. I think playing off ball is really throwing him for a loop, he was clearly more comfortable running point than he was in the 1st half playing off ball. 

Such a damn good game. I was skeptical after playing both W1 and W2 and being lukewarm, so waited to get a good deal on it (25 bucks for goty edition last year) but it wound up being amazing. Even liked it better than Breath of the Wild when I played them both last year. On my list to replay sooner rather than later.

Damn that looks...ugh

Actually, a quick wikipedia search of “Laffer curve” will show you that most studies conclude tax ranges in around 70% would result in peak revenue, which we are very much not anywhere near right now, so by your own stated simplistic theory the American public is under taxed, assuming the goal is to achieve maximum

You’re making a long winded response to avoid the idea that maybe another corporatist is not what the public wanted. When did I ever say that the absence of voter suppression could not have made a difference? That’s never been my point. Are you not dense enough to understand pushing policies that nationally poll very

Jackass, reasons for voter turnout and decrease in turnout can be multifaceted in nature. Please make the argument that 100% of the turnout decrease was due solely to voter suppression (which was obviously a factor) and not at all due to decrease in overall enthusiasm. And are you seriously attributing Clinton being a

For the media, now a “moderate republican” is pretty much just one that doesn’t come off as a monster every time they talk.

In case you didn’t know, voter turnout was a large reason Clinton didn’t win. That means she didn’t energize the base. She received nearly 80,000 less votes from Detroit than Obama did in 2012. Trump received the same amount of votes in Wisconsin as Romney did in 2012, but Clinton received 230,000 less votes than

Lmao, what I read from your response is that you don’t have any way to refute the idea that the Dems’ inability to excite their base inhibits their appeal, so instead you just resort to snark to cover up a lack of argument. Good job. 

Except, no, because if the Democrats were a less shitty party the Republicans wouldn’t be in power right now. A major reason Clinton lost is because she didn’t excite anybody. Another corporate friendly, status quo, centrist candidate...great. If the Dems actually catered to their base they would be in power right

That’s sort of my point though. You can’t respect somebody’s opinion of “it was not consensual” while holding the opinion that it was. “Whether or not I got raped” is not a matter where you can respectfully disagree. 

Well, that’s not quite what he said, he said this: “Although I truly believe this encounter between us was consensual, I recognize now that she did not and does not view this incident the same way I did”

There’s not much to talk about there now that Trump has emerged victorious in the eternal Christmas War

What evidence? To be honest I’m confused what your comment means here, my point was that the evidence currently available does not indicate innocence, nor does it prove guilt. What evidence makes you feel he appears innocent?