Come to think of it, I'm pissed that Crimson Typhoon got killed so quickly.

I had money on that guy(s)!

As often as I saw this movie in IMAX 3D... I would have seen the propaganda if it was there.

(and it would have been in high-definition too!)

Now a TV series - that you can wrap without a proper resolution!

I also wish to award you an internet.

You are beautiful.

This was a great article, thank you for sharing all that personal baggage.

I doubt this comment will get enough attention to make an impact, but Charlie is referring to "smug atheists" not "all atheists" or "a majority of atheists"

Sounds bad, but please people - we are reacting to the recollection of a decade old pitch session. We have no idea how the episode would have panned out in the final cut.

I assumed Tom was let go after seeing that mass execution as a threat/reminder from the "Overlords" of just how ruthless they can still be. It just so happens to have worked in Red Eye's favor. Killing the others, on the other hand, was the thing that Red Eye had to do to keep up appearances. Makes perfect sense to me.

I too am baffled by the fact that this mythos is now fluffy-centric. Sure, there are a lot of cute/funny parodies that I truly enjoy, but often it seems that combining something Lovecraftian with something cutesy is a formulaic way to produce content.

HAH!

I would watch a video of Harrison Ford watching this video for the first time.

And lo, as the years past after Jack had dropped the giant from the great bean stalk to its death, the villagers had found their crops were more than sufficient to keep their stores full well into the bitter winter - and of course it would be; the giant was no longer around to horde their harvest, the earth was rich…

"I'm pretty sure a lot of people would be happy to love a beast with a giant magic castle who could eviscerate them if they didn't love him enough."

"There will be Air-Ships"

There. Fixed it for you.

Jesus that's harsh.

It's perfectly logical to suggest a well-known name is also good one.

That's because that is always the way it is intended to be read.

It's a pretty small sample size, and "Spousal Influence" is cited as a reason some of these parents brought their children to religious service. Not sure if it's fair to categorize those households with both religious AND non-religious parents as Atheist households, which only further skews the results.