The Clintons are NOT why we don’t have a deep back bench of liberal legislators to draw on for national elections. It’s because idiotic pseudo-liberals can’t be arsed to vote in midterm and local elections in order to get those fucking liberals into office in the first goddamned place.

I am genuinely shocked by this interview. That’s not snark, or partisanship, or anything else. 26 years in Congress, all of them championing progressive goals, eight of them since the financial crisis, EIGHT YEARS as a sitting, working legislator during the financial crisis and you don’t even know the legal…

Yeah, stupid Hillary with her research and planning and policy and basically knowing all of her shit. It’s almost like there’s a ephemeral reason why she needs to always come off prepared and not wing it like the rest of the people in the election.

Yes, as Sady Doyle said, Sanders was making law for 27 years. How do you expect for him to know anything about laws? Or even how to ride the Metro in washington?

I find it truly entertaining that the NY Daily News was the one who finally pushed for specific explanations. I suspect this next debate is gonna be little more specific than the previous softballs Sanders footed previously. Every.Single.Time. he went into this breaking up the big banks issue I was like but HOW…

It’s widely being proclaimed that the interview didn’t go all that well for Sanders (theWashington Post is declaring it a “disaster”).

No, this interview really was a disaster, and now you’re trying to write off how bad it was. His only answer on trade was that he agrees with Trump! And you’re trying to bury it with the inconsequential crap about the subway? Sanders finally gets tested on his policy, fails spectacularly, and this is all you can…

I think you kind of buried the lede on this. The president does not need to ride the subway. The president should have some concept of how they would execute their campaign promises.

I’m just gonna say it: Sanders in an idiot.

Is it that much of an overstatement? It is one thing to not know specifics about every issue, but to not be able to coherently articulate an analysis and plan to deal with his main focus is concerning. That he talks about that issue 90% of the time makes his lack of comprehension even worse.

I assumed he was keeping…

Yeah, Sanders has admitted that he will be going hugely negative against Clinton, and now it begins. It’s about his ego now. He doesn’t care if Hillary wins or loses in November and he sure as hell doesn’t care about the democratic party. I guess this is what happens when a guy who lived in relative obscurity becomes…

I know, right? She’s not funny and spontaneous enough. We need a President with improv comedy skills. But then again, she doesn’t have enough gravitas, what with all that trying to please everybody. Makes it hard to take her seriously.

Well, at least Kimmel is finding enlightenment Can’t say the same for Jezebel.

Not just because watching Hillary Clinton try to be funny and cool is cringe-worthy.

Every candidate who’s gone on that show has been somewhat “cringe-worthy,” if that’s what you want to call it. Because they’re politicians.

It’s as if all they only know of her campaign is what they’ve read Gawker/Jez.

This actually made me cringe. Not just because watching Hillary Clinton try to be funny and cool is cringe-worthy.

“Not just because watching Hillary Clinton try to be funny and cool is cringe-worthy” I must have watched a different video! How long did you spend writing this article? I thought she was great. I guess we have evolved from 2008 when we couldn’t stop talking about her looks...

she is going to CUT him.

Honestly, I love her in this. She looks like she’s gonna turn around and break his nose at any second.