None of what you just said contradicts, or even addresses, anything I said.  

There was nothing “condescending” about Deroir’s post. It’s exactly the sort of respectful feedback and suggestions I’d expect and encourage from a fan-base, to be honest. And there’s was absolutely nothing misogynistic about it, so for her to make it out to be an issue with her gender was projection at best, and an…

It came down to her insulting members of the community. Not in a “I’m insulted by what you said” way, but actual name calling. If you’re speaking on the behalf of the company you work for, you can’t do that.

Taking the original twitter spat alone, her behavior was ridiculous. She posted a multi-tweet essay, essentially, to a public space. Someone respectfully commented on that essay and she began passively insulting him.

That was great performance, I got nothing to add, I just really like this song.

It’s beautiful

Watching this reminds me of those videos you used to see on America’s Funniest Home Videos. The entire wedding party standing on a rickety old dock, or a rickety old patio, whatever. A good ~50 people standing on something that was not built to have ~50 people on it at one time. And then they all go tumbling down. 

Obviously you’ve never ridden a scythe at high speeds

Hiroshima... the radiation is finally showing its hellspawns

As someone who has worked in Convention management as a board member for several years, this article amuses me to no end. It’s easy to criticize conventions and the problems fans face until you learn the challenges of actually running one and the delicate balancing act everything is. Nice write-up Nathan.

If the code is copyrighted, which is a pretty valid assumption, you’re about as wrong as could be.  Are you trolling or normally this lost?

“Playing chicken” in this context would mean bringing a weak lawsuit against a competitor with a “bigger car.” Is it really this hard for you to admit when you’re wrong?

Unless you want to argue that Warner (a company so powerful that they were just bought by a weak cellular service provider) can cram $20 billion worth of lawyers into a single case, I think that it’s you who doesn’t understand what you’re talking about.

An executive who knows that Warner Bros could make Bethesda shit its pants and then make Bethesda eat said shit pants.

What about actually reading the article?

The issue is that Behaviour took code and assets that Bethesda had hired them to make (making Bethesda the copyright holder, hence the “work made for hire” language) and applied it to another project. Behaviour doesn’t own that code and had no right to copy it and use it for another client’s game.

it’s the same type of game yes but it was made by different dev with their own code/engine. What Bethesda is suing here, is not that the westworld game is the same type of game as fallout shelter, it’s that the westworld game use the exact same code and engine as the fallout one. Basically Behaviour did a copy/past of…